this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2026
760 points (98.5% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

42032 readers
3612 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BewareOfIdiot@nord.pub 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] nummy@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Non-nuanced explanation: Top flag - pro-cop. Bottom flag - libertarian, "anti-government". You can't be both.

[–] Vreyan31@reddthat.com 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

...You can but only in a really shitty way.

Which likely largely applies to the guy flying these flags.

Blue Line flag: "Authority should tread on THEM" Gasden flag: "Authority should respect ME"

I think Lindsay Ellis has a video that catalogs a lot of video of drunk conservatives who have behaved badly and are getting arrested, and their shock and horror that they do not get a free pass for being from the right "team".

There absolutely is a large segment of our society that implicitly believes that they deserve rights and that others are 'too dangerous' and deserve harsh oppression.

I think a lot of us further on the left forget that the concept of equal rights is fairly new to our species, and that humans will readily absorb 'rules for thee but not for me' - especially when it's encouraged by 24/7 propaganda outlets that we can't stand to watch.

[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think a lot of us further on the left forget that the concept of equal rights is fairly new to our species

With the fucked up part being large sections of the right believe that if someone else starts getting more rights (that they themselves already have) it means they now have fewer rights because they're being taken away.

When in fact, they still have more rights than the other group, they just don't have as many more as they used to

[–] abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Same thing applies to finances a lot as well "I don't want a burger flipper making $15! I only make $16 and I'm a (other job)!"

Like yes, but that means you're both being underpaid. Them getting paid enough to live doesn't mean you get paid less, if you feel your skill deserves more money, then fight for that money, don't hold other people down to keep your frail sense of superiority alive.

[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago

If the burger flipper makes $15 an hour then the price of a #10 value meal will go up to $14!!!

Well, they didn't get a raise and the price of a #10 is just about $14 🤷🏻‍♂️

[–] percent@infosec.pub -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sure, I suppose I can make an attempt...

In modern internet culture, it's an overwhelmingly common[^1] practice to mentally classify things with as few labels as possible (ideally just one label), ignoring the possibility of misclassification or nuance.

Applying that practice to the flags in the photo, the meme author ~~likely~~[^4] mentally classified each flag like this:

  • Thin Blue Line flag = Pro-authority
  • Gadsden flag = Anti-authority

Because the possibilities of misclassification and nuance are ignored, we can assume that these labels are correct.

Because the labels are correct, we can assume that it is actually the owner of the flags who is confused – not the meme author, nor us beholders/doomscrollers with whom the meme resonates.

Thanks to the logic of our "chain of assumptions"[^2] being correct, we can feel validated because our team wins again, and their team loses again[^3]. We are drawn to this feeling. We are more likely to upvote things that make us feel this.

This sort of mindset is not only socially acceptable, it is strongly encouraged[^1].


Footnotes

[^1]: Example: This post has 640 upvotes and 5 downvotes. (By the way: Those 5 down-voters are alt-right, Trump-supporting, boot-licking, racist, homophobic, transphobic, xenophobic, misogynistic, fascist nazis[^4][^3].)

[^2]: There might be an actual name for this. I'm just making this name up without bothering to research because I assume that most readers won't care.

[^3]: Warning: If you are wondering, "How?": Stop. It is socially unacceptable to ask this. It can only mean that you disagree[^4], and you risk being shunned and classified/labeled accordingly.

[^4]: This is considered correct because the possibilities of misclassification or nuance are safely ignored.[^3]

[–] moakley@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I downvoted it because I don't like when people misuse or overuse the phrase "cognitive dissonance".

[–] percent@infosec.pub -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

🤔 I was probably supposed to use one of those "/s" things somewhere, but not quite sure where it would fit.

I have no idea who the downvoters are, or what they believe in. I assumed that was obvious, and acknowledging that would have worked against the joke/example/theme/etc. of the rest of the post.

The entire thing is just an observation and sort of a "caricature"-style example/demonstration from the perspective of a guy who has never been much of a social media user. My social media skills are far below average. I should probably improve on that since I've been visiting Lemmy a lot more lately.

Anyway, just imagine an "/s", "jk", etc. wherever it makes sense. I mean no harm to anyone.

[–] moakley@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I appreciate the high effort.