this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2026
111 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

183 readers
103 users here now

Blacklisted SitesList inspired by other community rules.

  • Mac Rumors;
  • Al Jazeera;
  • NBC;
  • CNBC;
  • Tom’s Hardware;
  • ZDNet;
  • TechSpot;
  • Ars Technica;
  • Engadget;
  • TechCrunch;
  • Gizmodo;
  • Futurism;
  • PCWorld;
  • ComputerWorld;
  • Mashable;
  • Fortune;
  • Hackaday;
  • WCCFTECH;
  • Neowin;
  • Jacobin;
  • Yahoo;
  • Freethink;
  • Big Think;
  • Newsweek.

Technology news, blogs and articles.

Forbidden:

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

it's about Amazon not having disclosed this artificial end of life at the time of the purchase

Critically, the case claims that Amazon did not disclose to consumers at the time of purchase that the devices’ core functionality—that is, continued access to digital content on the Kindle Store—and users’ ability to update software could be reduced or eliminated for any reason at any time without a full refund of the purchase price.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago

That depends on whether you consider store access "core functionality". The devices still work, your existing purchases on the device are still there, and you can still load book onto them manually. And that doesn't even get into jail breaking and alternate store options.

It's an ereader, it still functions as an ereader, and you can still add new books, just not through the Amazon store. Sure seems like the "core functionality" is intact.