this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2026
111 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
183 readers
101 users here now
Blacklisted Sites
List inspired by other community rules.
- Mac Rumors;
- Al Jazeera;
- NBC;
- CNBC;
- Tom’s Hardware;
- ZDNet;
- TechSpot;
- Ars Technica;
- Engadget;
- TechCrunch;
- Gizmodo;
- Futurism;
- PCWorld;
- ComputerWorld;
- Mashable;
- Fortune;
- Hackaday;
- WCCFTECH;
- Neowin;
- Jacobin;
- Yahoo;
- Freethink;
- Big Think;
- Newsweek.
Technology news, blogs and articles.
Forbidden:
- Paywalled content.
- Older than 1 month articles;
- External video links(non native videos);
- Article talking about article, research or news.(Always use original articles).
- [New] Substack links: you can link to substack blogs, but the link should be a custom domain(not XXXX.substack.com).
founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
As much as I hate amazon - those devices are really really old. I own two of those and both happily download from my calibre library now.
it's about Amazon not having disclosed this artificial end of life at the time of the purchase
That depends on whether you consider store access "core functionality". The devices still work, your existing purchases on the device are still there, and you can still load book onto them manually. And that doesn't even get into jail breaking and alternate store options.
It's an ereader, it still functions as an ereader, and you can still add new books, just not through the Amazon store. Sure seems like the "core functionality" is intact.
As I said - I have 2 affected devices
yes, and you are saying it's OK on Amazon's side because they are old... but the point of the lawsuit is that, Amazon should have disclosed the time they expected those devices to be supported.