this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2026
82 points (92.7% liked)

Futurology

4421 readers
101 users here now

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"There are few limits to the service. The teen account must be connected to a parent or guardian, but once activated, teens can hail autonomous rides anywhere in Waymo’s service area in Nashville — and bring their friends along. Waymo told TechCrunch that teen account holders can bring up to three guests ages 13 to 17…….. it may also be part of the appeal for parents who would rather their kids pile into a Waymo than in a vehicle driven by a teenager. "

Waymo's charges are variable, so it's hard to directly compare the costs of exclusively using it versus car ownership. However, for most young drivers, car ownership costs are probably north of $10k per year, perhaps nearer $15k. That means for the lighter/less frequent drivers, Waymo is probably cheaper. Plus, robotaxis are only going to get cheaper. The day will come when it will be the more economical option for almost all urban drivers.

Another plus point, especially for parents, is how much safer they are. Motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death for people aged 15 to 24. What premium is there for avoiding the life-changing nightmare of your child dying in a traffic accident?

Once widespread robotaxis were a sci-fi hypothetical, but now it's becoming real. If robotaxis are finally becoming widespread, why learn to drive at all? It will be interesting to see if there's a falloff in the rate of driving tests among the young in Nashville.

Waymo’s latest expansion strategy: teenagers

US DoT Fatality Stats - PDF 6 pages

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gole@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If you squint real hard, it's a bus. In Korea they are running buses that have no fixed routes, can be hailed at bus stops, responsive to demand. Buses can be reimagined too!

[–] Player2@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A bus without set routes that you hail and only holds a few people is not a bus. It's a taxi

[–] gole@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You can say it's both, and rideshare too. The vehicle is 15 seats, slightly slower than taxi because it make more stops and take more people, and only stop at bus stops, but faster than ordinary buses because it does not make as many stops, only when requested. Also much cheaper than taxis (like < $2 per ride). I feel it is a nice balance, more choices is always better. Way better for society than private car (1 passenger per ride) or taxi (2 passengers per ride)

Here's a photo https://i.namu.wiki/i/cBBF9X2wMDx0FBBMpZSCbmNnbHkuAP1__Idj6-8OleJjKWZSK91cMGisgLPMYjor6T2ei_XtDg_bj-h8xtlEaruvgIxV9gdVRWkHJckdlOHFkDCpZdb4_VGo8rRsU0WiEBmhtw4s1YPssoSwP4fw9g.webp

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

If you squint real hard, it’s a bus.

Sure. A bus that caps out at five people.