Femcel Memes

3516 readers

421 users here now

Welcome to femcel memes. A place where anybody can post memes that fit the vibe.

Warning: We have a tendency to post things that may at times come from a self-deprecating perspective or things that are funny coming from another queer person. This space will always be a safe place for transfems, non-binary people, people with a feminine gender expression (GNC or otherwise) or anybody else in the LGBT Community to come together and share about our experiences but we truly feel that laughing about the sometimes silly and embarrassing parts the queer experience can help bring us together. We never mean offense or harm in anything posted but rather they are satirical takes coming from queer people.

A note about 'Egging': Our community is mostly made up of transfem individuals, and as such most memes posted will be posted with the intention of having a transfem perspective. However, regardless of gender identity, all feminine presenting individuals are welcome here. Whether that means you're NB, GNC, transmasc, or any other identity, you are welcome here. It is not our intention or goal to invalidate these identities. If something makes you uncomfortable, please feel free to report the post and I will address your concerns on an individual level. For more information regarding the problems with 'Egg-culture', please see Here.

Avoid posting AI slop and point it out when you see it, but also be chill and civil about it and don't go on witch hunts or moral crusades about it. Rather than trying to "hold people to account," try to help people avoid it. Turning it into a shame game does not fit the vibe.

Love Y'all and thank you for following this community

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world

TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone

squirrel@lemmy.blahaj.zone

Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone

330

2026 ☄️ (lemmy.world)

submitted 3 days ago by kewwwi@lemmy.world to c/femcelmemes@lemmy.blahaj.zone

27 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] minty@aussie.zone 23 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Glad someone has some hope.

I for one, have somehow obtained negative hope

[–] zikzak025@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Go low enough and maybe you could have an integer overflow set you back to the highest value.

[–] verdare@piefed.blahaj.zone 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Ahem, *pushes up glasses*… It’s actually an integer underflow.

[–] PinkiePieYay2707@pawb.social 19 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Nope, pull those glasses down. There is no such thing as integer underflow, as the concept of underflowing refers to a lack of precision when attempting to enter a precise value. In other words, this applies to floats and doubles (and similar decimal types).

Example of how underflow looks like (though I admit it is a very basic example): you can put a number with two decimal places into a variable, but then you attempt to enter a number with three decimal places instead. In this example you will end up with either a rounded or cut-off number, because it would be impossible to enter that last decimal place, thus you lose precision. Hopefully this makes some sense, because in reality floats make little sense with all those mantissas and whatnot (ok they do make sense, but it's really hard and I don't like it).

Overflow refers to going from one end to another, regardless of direction. Try to type "integer underflow" in wikipedia, it should redirect you to overflow instead.

[–] queerlilhayseed@piefed.blahaj.zone 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Hold on to those glasses for a second. I searched for "integer underflow" and the first result was the wikipedia article for Integer Overflow which has this passage in the "Definition variations and ambiguity" section:

The case of an integer operation producing a value less than the smallest representable value is sometimes called integer underflow, though most commonly it is known as a type of overflow.[30] This usage is quite different from floating-point underflow, which refers to a floating-point value that is too close to 0.

That citation points to this definition on mitre (formatted for clarity):

CWE-191: Integer Underflow (Wrap or Wraparound): The product subtracts one value from another, such that the result is less than the minimum allowable integer value, which produces a value that is not equal to the correct result.

Integer underflow refers to a type of overflow (that is, an overflowing of the minimum bound instead of the maximum bound) and it's a different thing than floating point precision loss. To use the odometer example from Wikipedia, it would be like running the odometer backward until it goes from 000000 to 999999, which is an invalid result since 0 - 1 =/= 999999.

Given the evidence, I move that the council of pedants keep /u/verdare's glasses pushed up. I further move that they get bonus pedantry points since they are both technically correct and needlessly specific, since it is also true that "overflow" is correct in this case, which is the most pedantic kind of correct :)

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago

Masterful, S Rank, no notes.

[–] sqw@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 3 days ago

thanks, this pointed me in the direction of learning a new thing.

[–] minty@aussie.zone 5 points 3 days ago

Ill redownload social media to test if this is will happen

[–] kewwwi@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

get your hopes up debbie downer !

[–] minty@aussie.zone 6 points 3 days ago

Ill try lmao. But yes i really have noticed i fit that description at times lmao