Programmer Humor

35334 readers

1 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
No NSFW content.
Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS

cat_programmer@lemmy.ml

When a real user uses the app (lemmy.ml)

submitted 2 years ago by roon@lemmy.ml to c/programmerhumor@lemmy.ml

56 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Lmao, yeah.... You can make a can so secured a bear definitely won't get in; but will people go to the effort to use it then?

Definitely some overlap there.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

And I think that hits on the truth, which makes this less "iamverysmart". It's not that the tourists are dumb, it's that they're new and not willing to pay much attention to things like trash can design. 1% of a normal person's attention presents a lot like a really dumb person.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Is it 1%? Maybe when they first try to open it they're distracted But when doesn't open and now they're concentrating on the problem and still fail, then we have to kinda own up to the fact that a lot of people aren't smarter than a bear.

[–] Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk 1 points 2 years ago

I'd be pretty distracted by the bear waiting behind me for his go.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I think if they can score 100 on an IQ test, they can figure out any reasonable trash can eventually, assuming the moving parts are visible. Many people would rather just litter.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 1 points 2 years ago

100 is the average, implying half the population is lower than that, but otherwise, sure

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

i’m not really sure what IQ has to do with this. it was originally designed to measure people’s proficiency in school. it was not designed to be a general measure of intelligence. that was something that was co opted by eugenicists.

here’s a quote from Simon Bidet, the original creator of the IQ test, about his thoughts on the eugenicists using his test:

Finally, when Binet did become aware of the "foreign ideas being grafted on his instrument" he condemned those who with 'brutal pessimism' and 'deplorable verdicts' were promoting the concept of intelligence as a single, unitary construct.

you can read more about this stuff on his wikipedia page. (the quote is from wikipedia)

even to this day, there is quite a bit of doubt as to how accurately IQ measures “general intelligence”