this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2026
46 points (89.7% liked)

Free and Open Source Software

23093 readers
24 users here now

If it's free and open source and it's also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Where Fluxer is headed in 2026 and what we're working on next.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] uuj8za@piefed.social 5 points 1 month ago

They do have an LLM usage policy, if anyone is interested: https://github.com/fluxerapp/fluxer/blob/main/.github/LLM_USAGE_POLICY.md

The tl;dr is: you can use an LLM for private research, but you cannot use an LLM to write anything (except translations).

This line is kinda sus though:

This policy applies to every person who does not have write access to this repository.

... So... is this Hampus carving out an exception for himself? <x-files.mp3>

Overall, I'm a huge Fluxer fan. I think they're doing the right things 90% of the time. I've never seen them enthusiastically embrace AI, but they haven't been vocally anti-AI either. The LLM policy does basically seem like a ban though?

IDK. I suppose the large amounts of code churn may be a sign of AI? That's definitely not conclusive though. Any software engineer will tell you running a code generator (not LLM, we have to regenerate our protobufs every time we change our API) or a code formatter or static analyzer (updates a bunch of files) or vendoring your deps (shout out to Go devs) will also inflate your line count.

I also checked out a few random files and they don't look like the slop I'm forced to generate at work. I glanced at like 5 files. I guess Hampus could be tuning Claude to hide the AI slop better? IDK... this is all starting to feel like a conspiracy theory...