this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2026
928 points (98.1% liked)

Music

12016 readers
152 users here now

Per community feedback, low-effort GenAI posts are disallowed.

↳ Our family Communities:

➰#Music

Music.world - !music@lemmy.world

Jazz -!jazz@lemmy.world

Album Art Porn - !albumartporn@lemmy.world

Fake Album Covers - !fakealbumcovers@lemm.ee

Obscure Music - !ObscureMusic@lemm.ee

Vinyl and LP's - !vinyl@lemmy.world

Electronic Dance Music - !edm@reddthat.com

60's Music - !60smusic@lemmy.world

70's Music - !70smusic@lemmy.world

80's Music - !80smusic@lemmy.world

90's Music - !90smusic@lemmy.world

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2xar@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

She felt it necessary for her to speak out publicly against Macklemore showing the genocide that Israel is comitting. She did not feel necessary to speak out publicly againts the genocide itself. Priorities...

[–] Tja@programming.dev -4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Yeah, fucked up priorities, but not proof of support...

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

you know how often the literal Nazi leaders publicly said they were doing a genocide, and were in support of genocide? while they were doing it? this is some flawed logic bud.

[–] Tja@programming.dev -4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is pink now doing the holocaust?

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Support isn't exclusively stating you explicitly support genocide and nothing else. The majority of support is going to look like people who refuse to mention anything at all about the genocide but show up to tell people AGAINST the genocide that their actions, methods, wording, and choices are wrong. that's about the strongest public support you'll see. if your argument is no one can call it support because she isn't saying out loud 'I support the genocide in Palestine' you're making a very bad argument. Historically, a supporter of atrocities is going to tell others to sit down and shut up, it's going to claim nothing is actually happening, it's going to argue that the law allows the abuse or forbids aid and that's just because it's the law, or something else along those lines, it's never going to be someone saying they support the genocide directly.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's not support, that's tolerance. Just like murder, there's degrees of wrong.

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

you're not making a comment your making a statement. this isn't an argument is a disagreement. these aren't words they're collections of letters.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's no shades of gray on lemmy, I know. Any attempt at nuance bounces off.

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

can you look up which logical fallacy is the one where you ignore the argument and argue about the building the argument takes place in, I forget what it's called....

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 1 points 23 seconds ago

you will be when you figure out reading comprehention. let me know when you get there.

[–] 2xar@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If you are not supporting a genocide then why would you attack people who are trying to fight against said genocide?

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago

Thousands of reasons, greed, stupidity, narcissism, ...

[–] Hupf@feddit.org -4 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] 2xar@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago