this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2026
916 points (98.4% liked)

Atheism

6453 readers
1074 users here now

Community Guide


Archive Today will help you look at paywalled content the way search engines see it.


Statement of Purpose

Acceptable

Unacceptable

Depending on severity, you might be warned before adverse action is taken.

Inadvisable


Application of warnings or bans will be subject to moderator discretion. Feel free to appeal. If changes to the guidelines are necessary, they will be adjusted.


If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a group that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of any other group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you you will be banned on sight.

Provable means able to provide proof to the moderation, and, if necessary, to the community.

 ~ /c/nostupidquestions

If you want your space listed in this sidebar and it is especially relevant to the atheist or skeptic communities, PM DancingPickle and we'll have a look!


Connect with Atheists

Help and Support Links

Streaming Media

This is mostly YouTube at the moment. Podcasts and similar media - especially on federated platforms - may also feature here.

Orgs, Blogs, Zines

Mainstream

Bibliography

Start here...

...proceed here.

Proselytize Religion

From Reddit

As a community with an interest in providing the best resources to its members, the following wiki links are provided as historical reference until we can establish our own.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zensate@lemmy.world -1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

There's no distinction between sociopath or psycopath, both were dropped from the DSM in favor of ASD.

I'm gonna assume you're not arguing in bad faith and have just been brought up sheltered or in a cult - the reason we have POLICE which enforces laws through VIOLENCE is that people generally need fear to not do bad things.

It's not something religious people need, nor people with ASD, the majority of the people in our jails are not mentally ill.

It's something every society in every era of history has recognized as a necessity, including the one you live in right now.

People WILL do bad things unless they have fear of punishment, people are not naturally empathetic or oriented towards social cohesion. That's why crime and punishment is a perennial instution throughout all recorded history.

I'm going to avoid all the insults at the end, I don't know your past history but the voracity with which you sling insults whenever someone disagrees with you has apparently never occured to you to be immoral, unempathetic, or against social cohesion, so I doubt it will land today either.

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

They're both not currently official diagnoses but they mean different things in common use.

"People" do not generally need fear to not do bad things. Some people need fear to not do bad things. Outliers do not define the norm.

Religious people are not less violent or criminal than nonreligious people. See all of recorded history. I don't have data for ASD other than that until quite recently it was under-diagnosed and very poorly understood so there's little value in historic comparison.

Law enforcement looks pretty different across time and cultures but the general through line is not "every person has to be watched lest they descend into barbarism" (despite what thin blue line types would have you believe) it's that an unguarded flock is easy prey. Predators are rare and always have been.

People are naturally empathetic and we aren't the only animals like that. Toddlers have empathy well before they can be taught the cause-and-effect of possible punishment. Altruism is a very valuable trait for social animals to ensure survival of the species. The specifics of etiquette are taught but basic principles of fairness and comfort are in our DNA. Crime and punishment exist because the natural systems aren't perfect, and desperate/traumatized people are more likely to take advantage of others for personal gain. It's worse when society rewards amoral self-enriching behavior, as it does under Capitalism, because hate and selfishness can be taught just as surely as morality is. (Morals and ethics aren't exactly the same thing, and they do differ between cultures, and some pretty heinous things are enforced thanks to religious indoctrination.)

Your claims aren't backed up by any kind of science. And if you think that's a cavalcade of verbal barbs maybe it is your first day on the internet.

[–] Zensate@lemmy.world -1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

The term of sociopathy was retired in the 60's, so no, it doesn't mean anything. You aren't talking to anyone who was alive back then, so if you've heard it used it's been misused.

The idea that children are born with empathy is hilarious, while there are interesting baby studies suggesting this, any school yard or classroom will quickly dissuade anyone of that notion. Anyone who has gone to a school or worked as a teacher knows this.

And it's a good example to go into, because once again, the only thing that keeps a large subset of children from doing bad things is punishment, and usually that just makes them better at avoiding it.

And humans... come from children, and they largely don't change or mature as they grow up, studies who have tried to estimate the general mental age of humans find that they are stuck around 13-16 years old and stay there. And when we see how most people are just one bad day away from exploding, getting out and fighting someone in another car, or similar, that's not much of a surprise to anyone.

I don't know what "thin blue line" is, I assume it's American thing, but no when it comes to greater civilisations throughout history we actually do find that law enforcement looks about the same, and that people can be exceptionally cruel and callous even when they don't gain anything from doing it except the pleasure of inflicting pain, emotional or physical.

There's no evidence that people are naturally empathetic, and if they can be found to be so at the toddler stage we are effective at growing out of it. But you are right to point out some important point, we have invented Capitalism, probably the least empathetic system of governance we could come up with in which the individuals ability to take as much from everyone else is celebrated and deified - and whoever fails is seen as a loser who just didn't try hard enough. As expected, it's no manifestation of some innate empathy there.

Then there's the fact that at any given time there's at least a 100 different armed conflicts going on on the earth at any time. Oh, and currently a Genocide too.

Then there's our enormous system of law, which is always in an armsrace trying to illegalize the new ways in which people attempt to break the rules so that they can gain from taking from others, or just destroy what others have so that they have less. From giant corporations fighting each other, to simple neighbour feuds where two people simply cannot manage to coexist even if there weren't any problems between them to begin with - strife is the nature of humans on all levels and it needs constant arbitration to find out who was wrong, who was right, and how much they need to be punished.

And they certainly don't need any religious excuse for these things, they're quite happy to do it without any divine justification. The ills of religions are simply an extension of the ills of humanity.

I appreciate you pointing out that if you're on the internet you apparently should be ready to be insulted, because otherwise you're what, weak? Or naive? Once again the default human assumption is that we should expect there to be no consideration, probably that someone will hurt us, and if we don't like that, we better just toughen up because humanity is just so damn empathetic!

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Alright well I showed an actual study and you continue making unfounded claims so I'm done. You're not interested in the truth, just reinforcing your jaded cynicism.

[–] Zensate@lemmy.world 0 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

We live in a world of constant strife and lack of empathy, and every answer you've given here has been full of unnecessary contentiousness and zero signs of empathy.

You yourself have proven your own argument to be wrong with your conduct, it was never necessary to bring in the rest of humanity or any studies.

Lost in your idealist platitudes about the goodness of mankind, you completely failed at empathy right here and now in a real human interaction, and when called out about it, you literally said: "Toughen up buddy".

This whole thing reads like a comedy sketch.

You were the quintessential refutation of your own argument from your very first reply, and it only got worse from there.