this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2026
59 points (100.0% liked)

Flippanarchy

2796 readers
206 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.

  7. No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.


Banner by @Val@anarchist.nexus

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
59
So I made this. (anarchaos.s3.eu-central-003.backblazeb2.com)
 

After people reacted so positively to the banner I made I had the idea to do the same with c/anarchism. But what to draw? Well I took the existing image and traced over it, adding some more character.

License (as always): CC-0, no rights reserved. Especially since it's traced over a generated image.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Telorand@reddthat.com -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Nuh uh" isn't an argument. It's not even a syllogism. You're just asserting that as fact.

I've given plenty of examples of how it is stealing from artists, specifically in the case where they have not given that consent, and now it's your turn to provide something even resembling an argument.

[–] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's a prima facie case, so it doesn't need a complex rebuttal. You are just sealioning. While your point is a popular refrain for euro-centric ancaps, it holds no weight here.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com -1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

And now the ad hominems. You're just a bag of fallacies, aren't you? "It doesn't need a complex rebuttal," is all the proof anyone needs that you don't have an argument. You just don't want to feel bad about being a class traitor.

[–] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 20 hours ago

Think of the starving rent-seekers?

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

You’re just a bag of fallacies, aren’t you?

🪞

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 0 points 16 hours ago

Wow, and now the cavalry is here with, "No u." Classic.