this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2026
69 points (94.8% liked)

No Stupid Questions

49714 readers
363 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cattywampas@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I don't know. You'd have to take that up with the IOC. Males and females have different body types and maybe it's just not comfortable or practical for males to play volleyball in a banana hammock, or maybe they'd all love to, who knows.

My thesis statement here is that the female athletes who choose to wear bikinis are choosing to of their own free will, and whatever reasoning a person has to wear what they wear is their own business. Though I suspect that at the Olympic level everyone is going to wear what they feel most comfortable and capable in, just like the player interviewed above.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

My thesis statement here is that the female athletes who choose to wear bikinis are choosing to of their own free will, and whatever reasoning a person has to wear what they wear is their own business.

Ah, I see. Unfortunately for this conversation, it's never been in question that since 2012 women's beach volleyball players have had the option of several less-revealing outfits. So in light of that, could you please tell me why you felt it was appropriate earlier to insult me when your cited article was evidently provided entirely to address your own thesis, but did not in any way address mine?

[–] cattywampas@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Ah, my apologies - I did not realize someone had lept in for one comment.

And while abstractly interesting, those all continue to not address my thesis. They're addressing yours quite well, though. I applaud you for having such a well supported thesis. I do invite insight on this - perhaps the journal of ergonomics would be a better place to start looking than Business Insider though.

[–] cattywampas@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm not sure what you're looking for. If it's some kind of scientific paper on the effectiveness of different types of clothing on volleyball performance, you're not gonna find that.

You said you were skeptical of two pieces being better for performance than other clothing. I gave you, from a two minute internet search, a half dozen high-level female volleyball players who have all said they prefer to play in two pieces because of comfort and performance. Comfort itself is an advantage. Do you think that they're wrong?

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world -2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

You said you were skeptical of two pieces being better for performance than other clothing.

Where did I say this? It has never been the question I asked, but it has been the one you've answered and I've repeatedly clarified that it was not my question. It would be nice if that was my question - indeed, I think it even requires far less than two minutes to find an answer to. But it's not my question, nor has it at any point been.

[–] content_educator_94@thelemmy.club 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

We get it man, you hate bikinis

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

That's uh. Well, rather demonstrably wrong. On both points.

[–] content_educator_94@thelemmy.club 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Damn, I'm not reading the room well, pardon me then

Walks away looking confused and disappointed

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

(Sorry - It's a reference to my post history. You may need to turn on NSFW photos to get the joke, I know some clients block them by default.)

I'm all for the reason they wear them being exhibitionism (clearly) but that's never been what I've said. They're answering the question "are female beach vollyball players forced to wear bikinis", an easy question to answer and one I've never asked; what I asked was "if they're clearly a performance enhancement, why are the men not wearing them too?" which is a much more difficult thing to get an answer for.

[–] cattywampas@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Do you believe that female volleyball players who wear two pieces choose to do so because they feel more comfortable and more capable in that clothing?

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

What? I've said yes twice now. What has that got to do with this? It's not, and has not been, my question.