this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2026
547 points (98.1% liked)

People Twitter

10387 readers
1228 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major celebrity, figure or any politician. https://web.archive.org/save is an option. Archive.is is no longer recommended because they remove/alter content.
  7. If a tweet (or similar) makes a statement of fact, either mark it as "satire" in the body or provide the original source link backing up the statement

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 48 points 3 days ago (1 children)

We could have tribunals. I'm just saying. There's nothing that says we couldn't set up, I was going to say kangaroo courts but honestly normal courts would work too, but either way courts in which these executives are put up against the wall. We could do that. We could cleanse

[–] i_stole_ur_taco@lemmy.ca 25 points 3 days ago (5 children)

We could. But Pop Tarts are a poor reason to start a revolution.

Like, I’ll come, don’t get me wrong, but I don’t want the ‘tart on our flag or anything.

[–] papalonian@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

but I don’t want the ‘tart on our flag or anything.

You fly your colors, I'll fly mine.

[–] moondoggie@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

I dunno, I could see the felon saying “Let them eat Pop Tarts” from the White House balcony.

[–] Leviathan@fedinsfw.app 4 points 2 days ago

All reasons are valid when we have a common enemy.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 3 points 2 days ago

It's the principle of the matter. All of these executives that pushed enshittification should face consequences. It doesn't matter what their product is.

[–] chunk6235@piefed.social 3 points 2 days ago

They're an example, not the reason. They're indicative of the failures of capitalism to innovate past shrinkflation and repackaging the original as 'more' for more money.