this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2026
578 points (99.8% liked)

politics

31043 readers
1634 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 58 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

I've called it a while back. Make a database of people's political affiliation using social media posts and other sources. Have agents sit outside polling places with facial recognition technology that flags anyone on that database that is likely to vote Democrat and detain a number of them until the polling ends then release them without charge. This prevents them from voting and can have a significant impact on the outcome of the elections.

On top of that they're going to have mail in ballots thrown out, further interfering with free and fair elections.

This is coming. Trump knows he will have his ass absolutely handed to him in the mid terms given his well-deserved abysmal approval rating. Better fight back now.

And if the US ever manages to recover from this blatant establishment of a dictatorship, every single one of those who participated at this should be charged at the fullest extent of the law. There is no claiming ignorance of what they're doing. Even floating the idea of sending ICE to arrest people at polling places is a violation. They know damn well that they're rigging the election.

[–] Didntdoit71@feddit.online 30 points 4 days ago (3 children)

They know it, and they know that we know it. They don't care. That's what people aren't seeing straight enough. Trump and the Guardians Of Pedophiles ate blatantly trying to cheat amd telling people how much they're going to cheat. Now, show me one, single US citizen that's done anything concrete to actually stop him. I'll wait. Instead, there will be more protests. Then he'll call the protesters unpatriotic traitors and MAGAts will eat it up. They'll not only cheer for him as he sacrifices our democratic elections, they'll say it was the right thing to do to "save America" from people smarter than them. Which is everyone too intelligent to be a MAGAt.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

They're daring us to try and stop them by force, in order to invoke the exception in the law another commenter cited. They want to pretend that us trying to stop their coup makes us the "armed enemies of the United States" instead of them.

This is the consequence of failing to prosecute Trump for Jan 6.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago

there will be more protests

Where people stay in their designated protest areas during the designated protest times in order to not be too much of a bother. Need to make sure they're back to work on time Monday morning for the oligarchs! Oh, and clean up after yourselves before you leave too to make it as easy as possible for everyone to pretend to never happened...

[–] Malica@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

There was that guy that set himself on fire. End of list.

[–] mattyroses@lemmy.today 3 points 3 days ago

Nolan Bushnell?

I mean, I'd count Luigi among others. And taking them out is a lot more effective than taking yourself out IMHO.

[–] Cricket@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago

Have agents sit outside polling places with facial recognition technology that flags anyone on that database that is likely to vote Democrat and detain a number of them until the polling ends then release them without charge.

I learned something interesting about the upcoming Brazilian elections the other day that seems intended to counter exactly this kind of thing: there's a law (and perhaps it's in the constitution, I don't recall exactly) that says that no one shall be arrested for a couple of days around the election date, unless someone is caught in the act of a crime or if it's for a major crime.