this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2026
295 points (99.3% liked)

Boycott US

2638 readers
803 users here now

Overview:

The community dedicated to boycotting the US until they stop fascism, restore full democracy and start following international law.

Americans have a moral obligation to resist Donald Trump and project 2025 at every turn.

America is a flawed democracy currently being ruled by oligarchs. Stop the backslide! Dont let America become the next Hungary.

America needs to challenge the court rulings of citizens united v. fec and shelby county v. holder, protect the media, implement independent district drawing, and the single transferable vote so they don't end up having people stay home in life-changing elections because they cannot vote for their favourite candidate.

Join 50501.chat to fight back!


Related communities:

Boycott:!buycanadian@lemmy.ca

!buyeuropean@feddit.uk

!boycott@lemmy.sdf.org

!boycottchina@sopuli.xyz

Activism:!antitrumpalliance@lemmy.world

!petitions@lemmy.ca

!palestine@lemmy.dbzer0.com

!protest@lemmy.world

!israelicrimes@lemmy.world

!patriotsforprogress@lemmy.ca

!goodsuniteus@lemmy.ca


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Google has decided to rename Lake Ontario in the US. Please uninstall Google Maps.

While I understand they’re pulling data from the US government, they have no actual legal obligation to comply. This is entirely a choice an executive at Google made.

Did you know: When you click a link on Google and then go there Google tracks your location and links it to all your ads. This feature is called Local Search Ads, and you can hit Google’s pocketbook directly in protest by not having Google Maps installed.

When you have Google Maps installed Google is always tracking you. That tracking data feeds into a lot of products: things like mapping cell and wifi networks to geolocations, ads, recaptcha, search, and more. Google stores a profile of who you are, where you live, where you work, who you visit, etc.

If uninstalling is too much for you go to your Google account and disable Location History in privacy settings. Alternatively, click your user profile icon and turn on incognito mode, which disabled tracking and other features.

This will reduce the data linked to your profile (though, in reality, there’s no assurance this does anything, like when that disabled Nest camera was used by the FBI last year).

Browsing without an account does not have the effect. If you simply log out you have no privacy limitations enabled.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pedz@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I tried OsmAnd in the past, I paid for it and it's still installed in my phone, but I keep going back to Google Maps for "default" maps. OsmAnd is missing the Cycle Map layer of openstreetmaps.org and is not super useful in my case. And we all know Google Maps is very bad for cycling too, but it's good at finding places, so I just make my own route instead of using the four lane artery it suggested me to cycle on.

The exception is when I'm hiking or walking long distances and need to find/record my position on a map, relative to a pedestrian path or hiking trail. For this I've always used AlpineQuest. I don't know if it's made by Americans though. AlpineQuest also has the Cycle Map layer, so it's my second favourite map app, but I mainly use it when I'm in a big park, or not in a city.

Still, openstreetmaps.org with the Cycle Map layer is wonderful for planning cycling and hiking routes by yourself. Unfortunately it's just absolutely bad at making any kind of route by itself.

I've just heard about CoMaps recently. I also don't know if it's mainly American, but it's open source, community driven, and based on OSM data, which is important. It has adresses and seems like a promising alternative to Google Maps for my "default" searches, so I'm going to give it a try. However it's just an app and there doesn't seem to be a simple website matching the mobile experience, so I'm kind of guessing that I won't try it for long.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

CoMaps is missing so much information in my area and only navigates you to the address block if done by address. Also navigating by address means I'd have to find the address of the place first probably in Google maps and then put it in.

[–] Stampy@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Cycloroute and Brouter can be added to OSM. I've never gotten brouter to work though. Cycloroute seems the best for my area.

[–] pedz@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

I'm not familiar with Cycloroute nor Brouter, and can't find much about them. What are they?

[–] vividspecter@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

OsmAnd is missing the Cycle Map layer of openstreetmaps.org and is not super useful in my case.

Do you mean CyclOSM? If so, you just have to configure some settings, although I agree it's non-obvious.

[–] pedz@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

No. I can get CyclOSM on OsmAnd but I really don't like it because it's too busy and difficult to tell the difference between types of bike paths. Also, CyclOSM has always been very slow in a browser on any of my computers, having tiles taking a few dozen seconds to load. Cycle Map is the layer next to CyclOSM and to me, it's very useful because it highlights major paths, by national, regional and local. A bit like showing the highways for bikes. Both layers are useful but given that CyclOSM is very very slow, and lacks those highlights, I prefer Cycle Map.

For reference, CyclOSM looks like this when there's no tiles missing:

And Cycle Map looks like this:

[–] vividspecter@aussie.zone 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Digging around, it looks like that cycle map source was removed from osmand due to API costs, which doesn't apply to the browser version for whatever reason (or openstreemap.org are paying for it).

EDIT: I'm guessing you already tried it, but the built in "bike routes" option is less busy in my location. It seems to only work with the offline vector maps though, so I couldn't quickly test how it looks in Montreal. Although testing another city it looks busy enough to be problematic for you I suspect.