this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2024
894 points (98.0% liked)

Housing Bubble 2: Return of the Ugly

1249 readers
1 users here now

A community for discussing and documenting the second great housing bubble.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] iamjackflack@lemm.ee 65 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Who cares, let population decline for a generation or so. Maybe we will stop producing so much shit and scale back

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago (4 children)

let population decline for a generation or so

But that's bad for the Big GDP Number

[–] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Not necessarily - less people means lower unemployment resulting in higher wages to attract people to your organization (income is directly linked to GDP). Phillips curve relationship.

Its a bitch for inflation though.

[–] Szyler@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)
[–] uis@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

![description goes here](link to gif goes here)

[–] s_s@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Oh no, not the economy!

Anyways...

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The Economy is kinda important, especially when the big Economy Computer starts telling everyone that a downturn in Brawndo sales means they're all homeless.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Big Economy Computer? I didn't know USSA already have built communism.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_People's_Republic_of_Walmart

With the size and scope of modern American mega-corps, we're closer to it than you'd think. Hayek's economic calculation problem is functionally solved.

[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah but the GDP per capita will skyrocket.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Transforming America into Monaco.

[–] iamjackflack@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

Would that be the worst thing in the world? Probably not

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

that's not how capitalism works. if you're not selling enough shit you find a way to make the same people buy more or pay more. line must go up. no scaling back. line must go up.

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (3 children)

But, now hear me out...what if it doesn't..

[–] NecroParagon@lemm.ee 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't understand... Are you saying, line go down? I've never heard of such a thing

[–] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

You've never seen my bank account ....

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

hahaha... haha... ok now that we laughed at that ridiculously absurd idea, let's watch the line go up.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

If line stays flat? Things kinda gradually get shittier for a while.

If line goes down? Economic collapse. Riots in the street. Civil anarchy. Homelessness and crime will skyrocket.

Those of you who have never taken an economics class think this is satire.

The problem is when corporate profits go up but wages stay flat or go down. Or when wages go up for some but not for others.