this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2026
22 points (84.4% liked)
Feminism
1617 readers
26 users here now
Welcome to the feminism community on Lemmy.World!
Rules:
- This is a feminist community, meant for discussing issues around equality and gender. Disagreement is acceptable but anti-feminist statements are not. Similarly, TERF-aligned comments, including anti-trans or other anti-LGBTQ+ sentiments are not allowed. This does not preclude debunking anti-feminist talking points.
- Posts must be related to feminism, gender issues, or related content. Topics can include current issues/news, historical topics, personal questions/thoughts, or discussion threads. If you are unsure if your post is on-topic, feel free to message the mods before posting.
- Memes and humor are allowed but should not be excessively posted.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Utilizing such language in your username will also result in a ban.
- Follow site-wide rules.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Where does it say that? It says
A bigger portion of the finding needs to go towards finding out if there really are sex differences. But this is not the same as 92.2% of spending ignores women.
According to the article the NIH has been required to include women in medical research since the 90s and have been required to determine whether there are any expected sex differences since 2016.
Also, if they determine that there are no sex differences, does it matter if the research has been conducted on female animals or not?
Go forth and read more.
This is the part that should tell me that 90% of the finding between 2013-2023 excludes women?
It's the part that tells you how medical research has approached the differences between genders and how everything has been based on male anatomy.