this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
345 points (98.9% liked)

Microblog Memes

10862 readers
1804 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TacticsConsort@yiffit.net 50 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I have to ask. What about this movie is so bad

I haven't seen it, I hadn't even heard of it until yesterday. But you don't get a flop THIS epic without some Morbius tier blunders

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I haven't seen it and, although I know it gets panned a lot for various reasons, I highly recommend at least reading the snippets of reviews of the film by critics to get an idea. Even a lot of the so-called positive films are basically 'this movie clearly sucks, but I liked it anyway.'

Basically, it's a very expensive, pretty, and totally incoherent mess of a film that a few people feel is profound but most people think is a colossal piece of shit.

https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/megalopolis/reviews

Also, some theaters have a lady stand in front of the screen and lip synch to a specific scene and then leave for some reason. Don't ask me to explain that.

Edit: also, that link provides you with gems like this one from Richard Roeper-

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

it's a very expensive, pretty, and totally incoherent mess of a film that a few people feel is profound but most people think is a colossal piece of shit.

It sounds like what people should have thought about Inception, but everyone instead apparently fucking loved that movie.

All the hate given toward Megalopolis makes me want to see it. Before that, I wasn't interested just based on the poster.

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I eventually want to see Megalopolis too.

I like watching art house movies and then figuring out what I don't like about it. Even the ones everyone loves. Magnolia was one people loved and I just didn't get.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah, well the thing is for me a lot of those types of movies are great but some are absolute trash. And then there are some that I have a lot of mixed feelings about. I don't really get most David Lynch movies for example, but I've rarely felt like watching them were a waste of time because at least you'll see something interesting. Then there's total bizarre experience films. I have no fucking clue what Holy Mountain was, but I was fascinated by it.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I could not get through The Holy Mountain. I like some art films, but not the ones that drag. That one seriously dragged.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I sort of enjoyed it. Like I said, it was bizarre and confusing but I'm glad weird movies like that can be made sometimes. If nothing else just to explore what can be done on film.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I'm all for exploration and experimentation in films. I just couldn't get through that one.

Peter Greenaway has made some fun art films. They often poke fun at themselves. My favorite is Vertical Features Remake, which is on this Russian streaming site for some reason, but you can watch it there in English for free, so what the hell...

https://ok.ru/video/6301559294652

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vertical_Features_Remake

[–] Denjin@lemmings.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The issue with this film however seems to be that not only is it incoherent and rambling, it's also incredibly dull.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Have you seen it or are you just repeating other people's opinions?

[–] Denjin@lemmings.world 5 points 1 year ago

I literally said seems to be

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I've seen it and that's a fair summary.

[–] BowtiesAreCool@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Everyone I’ve seen say that haven’t seen it. Also it’s an arty heady drama, of course it’s gonna feel slow at times and be more vague than your average viewer will like.

[–] Rolando@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I like watching art house movies and then figuring out what I don’t like about it.

Have you seen Aimy in a Cage? It's a great example of that. It's an art house film that does many things right, but unfortunately "something" wrong (I think related to editing or cinematography) so it's not very good.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Okay, but just so you know, it's 2 hours and 18 minutes long.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah, depends on the film if that's long or not. Lawrence of Arabia is one of my favorite movies. It is 3:45 long, and I'm glad they didn't cut it shorter.

[–] RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

The best part of Megalopolis was when he said "It's megalopolin' time!" and megaloped all over those guys.

[–] BowtiesAreCool@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Nah it’s just an expensive passion project art movie. It was never going to make money, it was Francis Ford Coppola finishing his last project that’s he’s been working on. I quite enjoyed it, despite there being obvious flaws, and many things that would make your average viewer not really care.

It can be a bit dated in references but generally they all land. There isn’t really a single unifying message which is what I would say is the biggest problem. It’s more interested in asking questions and posing that against our current real world than actually trying to answer them.

Apart from that the performances are generally all good, and while the characters feel like archetypes as opposed to clearly defined people, it works, for me at least.

It’s also just really weird. There’s dream sequences but seemingly they aren’t, just a perspective shift of what’s actually happening.

Overall I’d much rather watch Megalopolis than whatever Disney Corporate Movie Product comes out next. I’d prefer misses the mark but tries for something different and interesting, over cookie cutter formulaic plot beats and generic quippy characters.