this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2026
217 points (100.0% liked)

News

38895 readers
2300 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

German energy company RWE has said it will abandon its offshore wind projects in the US after reaching a $1.2bn (£892m) payout deal with Donald Trump's Department of the Interior (DOI).

RWE said that it will now reinvest the sum into conventional gas projects, including $900m (£669m) in a liquefied natural gas (LNG) export terminal project in Louisiana.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Also, petro is masculine, solar and wind: gay and feminine.

[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What is more masculine than harvesting the biggest available energy source in the solar system? Or extracting energy out of the movement of air like a Wizard? Using long dead microorganisms feels pretty mundane in comparison.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nope: drilling into the ground and pumping it out so you can "roll coal" on bikers and hybrids/EVs - heroic and manly, obvs.

Harvesting wind and solar: means UR GAY.

I'm of course kidding, but for a whole lot of men (and toxic women) they are dead serious about this kind of thing.

I remember one of my roommates pointedly throwing an aluminum can into the trashcan with about ten people in the kitchen with him - when the recycling bin was right there - it was butted up next to the trash can. It was not about effort.

When either myself or someone else asked him - uh, WTF, man? His response, not even kidding: "Recycling?!!! I'm not a F__!" I mean, this was the mid-90s and recycling was slowly creeping into daily life, but even then, there was kind of this general expectation that everyone is part of society and we have exactly one planet, and this kind of casual homophobia was not exactly embraced in most circles even back then.

But this guy was so worried he might be perceived as womanly or gay over giving a shit about the environment...

[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is such a sad story. So many men do not realize what patriachism is doing to them, making them behave like idiots and morons. It's also the source of why these men are so scared of being perceived as anything else than super-masc.

Patriarchism hurts everyone, not just women or the LGBT community. The expected behaviours are also violent against everyone who cares about their environment at large.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Also, it seems like a certain kind of man spends so much time on obsessing over this kind of thing. I just don't get how someone can possibly have the time or energy for such nonsense, though I've definitely had these types in my life in high school and in college.

But seeing someone like Jesse Watters clutching his pearls with his "rules for men" is so wild that I sometimes wonder if he's not really something like a Sacha Baron Cohen character doing a very long con.

I mean, telling men they cannot cross their legs, or drink soup or use straws in public? Is he serious with that shit? If Jesse Watters was someone in my life, I'd go out of my way to do all three in front of him. Maybe I'd drink soup through a straw, while crossing my legs, LOL.

Same goes for what I hear about some of the younger "influencers" telling a bunch of young men/teenagers how to be men...it borders on the comical, but I think it's also quite dangerous to our culture.

[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I have to agree, and want to add to you last paragraph.

The "influencers" are only able to spread their bullshit because we left young men behind somewhere 20 years ago in feminism. I agree that feminism should be primarily about women, but most of feminism did never think about what role young men should strive towards when patriarchism is dismantled. We now have a situation where feminism was able to improve the situation of women somewhat, but it also created a lot of uncertainty in young men who feel that they now have no place in a society that often is prejudicial against them because it is expected that they behave just as bad as the previous generations. This opens up an opportunity for the worst of humanity, coming from the right wing - they are filling their minds with misogynist and anti-LGBT ideas to give them an identity that they are missing because the previous push against patriarchism offered no alternative to them.

The next wave of feminism should take that as a lesson: you can't just dismantle a system without offering the participants of that system a worthwhile position in the new system, or they will refuse your system - often violently.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wow, this is so very well said. It's hard to thread this needle, because even when you state it as well as you do, you'll sometimes have people getting their back up about how you are "centering" males and so on. It's not about centering any one group (to me), it's about trying to push things forward without leaving anyone behind.

Oh, and for a minute there, I thought you were responding to this: https://lemmy.world/post/50415802/25191138

[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 2 points 1 week ago

Oh you are right, my comment fits there perfectly too lol