this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2026
791 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

86866 readers
3177 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Flightmussy@sopuli.xyz 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Maybe I should just create the new Facebook as well

[–] Magnum@infosec.pub 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Drop the 'the', just call it 'new facebook'. Thank me later.

[–] Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ah, the old American naming convention

[–] Magnum@infosec.pub 1 points 19 hours ago

Its more or less a quote from the movie.

[–] Flightmussy@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

Hmmmm people like services which are actually better than what Facebook currently offers. Maybe free dating apps, cool games and meet up services could attract new users. Get me a team and some beers and pizza, and I will make new Facebook.

However I will never be able to outcompete META. That is a different story. That is an insane company with the craziest infrastructure.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It's all about networks. It's not creating platforms that's hard, it's getting people to use them.

[–] Flightmussy@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It is super hard! However we should not give up just because it is hard or not possible. Anything is possible with right determination

[–] oppy1984@lemdro.id 2 points 1 day ago

We choose to do these things not because they are easy, but because we thought they would be easy.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

We shouldn't give up, but not everything that is possible happens, so just be aware that most ventures fail. But of course keep trying. Like with Lemmy.

[–] nandeEbisu@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A good product and marketing strategy can bootstrap an audience. You likely need to provide something beyond just a phone book. Even outside of Facebook there's a million of those but getting an audience for a new product is far from impossible, tons of new games do it all the time.

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The numbers are staggering. A game is incomparable. Facebook has over 3 billion users and instagram has another 2.5. Even a game like Fortnite “only” has a bit over 600 million users, and the vast majority of games see nowhere near that

You can bootstrap an audience in the millions, maybe, with a lot of luck, but getting to meta numbers takes significant capital to sustain your advertising. More importantly even with that it will still take ages. Facebook took almost a decade to get to a billion. Reddit took 18 years

Both platforms (and twitter, etc) are obviously infested with bots but what’s interesting is that from some research it appears the percentage of user accounts that are bots are far lower than many guess. I’ve seen people guess like 50+%. Per Facebook it’s more like 4-5%, and while Reddit doesn’t disclose based on content removal the numbers are similar (possibly slightly lower). This is definitely underreported though as it’s in their best interest to inflate user counts. Independent research pegs it closer to 20%. But the really interesting part is what validates the people guessing 50+%, which is user activity. Neither network comments on this but independent research pegs bots as responsible for like 50-70% of user activity.

So if you can get a network going with power users you can make it feel much more alive with possibly only 30% of the user base. But that’s where the staggering numbers come in. For Facebook that’s still 900 million people, almost 3x the entire population of america

[–] nandeEbisu@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I think you can start with niches or regional groups, they then start inviting others in.

WhatsApp and Discord basically had to bootstrap themselves and did it through niches and meeting a clear market need but we're then bought up by Facebook. There were plenty of group chat competitors and voice chat competitors.

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 hours ago

Discord is privately owned still but you bring up another key point: the players you’re up against are so powerful, with so much wealth and the most comprehensive legal representation, that even if you manage to have some success they will either buy you or destroy you. Meta has a presence on the fediverse, even