this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2026
608 points (98.9% liked)

Programmer Humor

32608 readers
835 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TeaWithDani@lemmy.world -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sure but you moved the goalpost from ''they weren't allowed'' to "they aren't being honest". There's people in this thread who are in the repos, so we can find that out without assuming.

Also, at least their model is opensource and can easily be selfhosted on consumer hardware. Helps with your datacenter point from earlier. Like if this project does what it says its supposed to do, it's genuinely interesting. If they are pushing the boundaries of permissive licensing then yeah that is really concerning.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sure but you moved the goalpost from ''they weren't allowed'' to "they aren't being honest

No. I included the lack of honesty in my original explanation.

If anyone's moving goalposts, it's you with your constant shifting from one point to the other to excuse their behavior.

If they are pushing the boundaries of permissive licensing then yeah that is really concerning.

Unless OP is a total lie, they clearly are.

[–] TeaWithDani@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why are you assuming I am excusing their behaviour?

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because you keep grasping for completely hypothetical scenarios in which it's excusable.

[–] TeaWithDani@lemmy.world -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Would you find it acceptable if their claims at face value were true?

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Another unlikely hypothetical.

Their claims are almost certainly not true. Which is part of the problem.

[–] TeaWithDani@lemmy.world -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You're just refusing to engage with point. ¯_(ツ)_/¯

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No. You keep restating points I've already addressed, pretending that I haven't.

[–] TeaWithDani@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yeah, its a strategy when you want someone to understand something they clearly haven't. You restate it in different words. You may have addressed it, that doesn't mean you understood my position. I don't mean that to sound bitchy btw. 😅 We just chatting. We cool. 👉 👉