this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2026
565 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

86783 readers
3689 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 30 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The next stage of this is going to be models of Flock cameras that look like other common security cameras, or a Flock module that plugs into existing security cameras and adds them to the network.

[–] My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] moncharleskey@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago

Mass Surveilance System... Online.

I Need to show this video to someone i know

[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Aren't flock camera more than just cameras as they scan for Bluetooth / wifi devices

[–] Justifier@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Yes, they are static wardriving nodes as well as cameras

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 6 points 1 day ago

I mean, plenty of security cameras have WiFi capabilities. Adding bluetooth wouldn't be a very big lift. It definitely wouldn't be big enough to prevent a smaller form factor.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 7 points 1 day ago

Sure, but there's no reason they couldn't be built into an enclosure that looks like other security cameras.

Alternatively, you just build a little box that has that extra stuff and plugs into a normal security camera, and you bury the box in the ground or put it inside a locked utility cabinet or something.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The next stage of this is having cops patrol flock cameras.

The whole 'mass surveillance' thing sort of does away with a need for traditional patrols.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How long do you figure before they get the Flock AI declared a police officer, therefore any damage to an AI-enabled device counts as assaulting an officer?

[–] volore@scribe.disroot.org 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Please don't give them ideas. Fido's one thing, but at least that's a sentient being that can feel pain. Officer Clanker, I hope to god, Satan, the FSM, Jibbers Crabst and whatever other deity may listen, is many many decades away.

If they start declaring inanimate fucking objects or robots to be police officers, all it will mean is that the penalty for vandalism and cop killing is the same... so you might as well earn it.