this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2026
966 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

86930 readers
3006 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mlg@lemmy.world 48 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I like how these only became a problem because Meta made them which meant a bunch of morons bought it.

Hidden and pinhole cameras have been a commercially available thing for decades, even on glasses.

Hell they even made one as a kids toy you could buy.

[–] Flatfire@lemmy.ca 39 points 1 week ago

Well, morons bought it and the device is directly connected to a data harvesting company. I think that has more to do with it. One lone weirdo with a hidden camera and a home server isn't the same kind of boogeyman

[–] raze2012@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

only became a problem because Meta made them

Anyone who remember "glassholes" knows this isn't new. Wearing a camera on your literal eyes is still a step too far in this otherwise compromised world.

But yes, I think the big issue here, as others pointed out, has to do with the nature of the company producing them. That'd be especially important for a place like DEFCON, which is all about securing your data.

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

It's not the cameras that are the problem, however, it's the companies behind them that I take issue with. It's one thing to be spied on by a camera, it's another thing when data collected from that camera feed is then sold to anyone who is buying. That's what I have a problem with. The cameras themselves aren't the issue.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 8 points 1 week ago

everyone remember google glasses: spying, watching porn was all anyone could think someone is wearing it.

[–] kevinsky@feddit.nl 3 points 1 week ago

Hidden and pinhole cameras have been a commercially available thing for decades, even on glasses.

And more or less equally problematic?