this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2026
183 points (97.9% liked)

politics

30600 readers
2130 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Trump administration is planning to scrap Medicare subsidies, which could leave seniors facing higher rates for their prescription coverage next year.

After 2026, the government will stop providing billions in subsidies to insurance companies that keep premiums low for Medicare prescription plans, known as Part D, Trump administration officials told The Wall Street Journal Tuesday.

Roughly 25 million people have Part D plans, and the average monthly payment was roughly $36 in 2026. Medicare recipients will learn of their new rates in the fall, right around the midterm elections, in which affordability is sure to be a key issue.

A Trump administration official told the Journal that 25 percent of Medicare enrollees would see their premiums stay the same, 30 percent would see an increase of less than $10 to their monthly bill, and 45 percent would see a monthly increase of between $11 and $20.

Note: The Trump administration has already overseen a price increase for some 700 prescription drugs covered by Part D plans.

The administration official claimed that the subsidies had encouraged insurers to raise rates, and that there would be other means of keeping premiums low. If not, there were other affordable options, the official said.

Boomers, aren’t ya just glad?

Source^

Boomers are the most entitled and spoiled generation there has ever been.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fizzle@quokk.au 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Boomers are in their 70s and 80s.

[–] tburkhol@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I think most people put Boomers as 60-80 in 2026. 81+ are "Silent Generation," and Gen X 40-60.

Sad to say, it looks like we can blame Gen X even more than Boomers for Trump.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Going by the numbers above, even young people voted for him at rates that could reasonably be called "about half". The stupid among us are in every age cohort.

[–] hatecoach@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sad to say, it looks like we can blame Gen X even more than Boomers for Trump.

Speaking as someone squarely in the Gen X age bracket that votes regularly, and more than just for presidential elections (and never for TFG). I know far more people my age that don't vote. In my state/districts in 2020/2022/2024, it didn't matter luckily, however the complete checking out is narrow-minded, and infuriating, as most seem to believe that voting makes them complicit in perpetuating the broken system. There are a couple that I'm glad didn't vote, as I know if they had, they would go down ballot R because that is what their dad did/does and heaven forbid any they spend any time to read/listen or any critical thinking is asked of them.

[–] tburkhol@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago

most seem to believe that voting makes them complicit in perpetuating the broken system

Maybe, if they're in a militia training to overthrow the system. Otherwise, they're just short of Sovereign Citizens, imagining they've got a cheat code to escape the moral burden of the failing system. I mean, definitely, let's change the system, but in the meantime, let's try for the least bad actors we can.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Well they are the ones who voted for Reagan as their first president… and then Bush Sr.

[–] tburkhol@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The oldest GenX were only 15 when Reagan got elected. Even for Clinton, X were still voting in small enough numbers to lay the blame on Silent & Boomers.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

There are different definitions from different people, I have seen people use Gen X starting as early as 1961 so there were GenXers who voted for Reagan the first time.

This is because where you’re born has as much to do with what generation you’re in as when you’re born. For instance if you were born in 1997 in Oklahoma you’re a Millennial, however if you were born the same year in San Francisco you’re probably a GenZer.

And I wasn’t blaming GenXers for Reagan, I was just pointing out that Reagan won Gen X as a cohort both times.

[–] rhymeswithduck@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The silent generation fought in WWII. If any are still alive they'd be closer to 100.

[–] tburkhol@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 day ago

You may be thinking of the Greatest Generation.