this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2026
333 points (97.2% liked)

Fediverse memes

3354 readers
527 users here now

Memes about the Fediverse.

Rules

General
  1. Be respectful
  2. Post on topic
  3. No bigotry or hate speech
  4. Memes should not be personal attacks towards other users
  5. We are not YPTB. If you have a problem with the way an instance or community is run, then take it up over at !yepowertrippinbastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com.
    • Addendum: Yes we know that you think ml/hexbear/grad are tankies and or .world are a bunch of liberals but it gets old quickly. Try and come up with new material.
  6. This is not the place to start flamewars between Lemmy, Mbin and Piefed.

Elsewhere in the Fediverse

Other relevant communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
BoozeOrWater@feddit.uk
flamingos@feddit.uk
Emperor@feddit.uk
wingsfortheirsmiles@feddit.uk
sga@feddit.uk
Mex@feddit.uk
sga@lemmings.world
sga@piefed.social
333
I leave lemmy for 2 days... (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 day ago by caboose2006@lemmy.world to c/fedimemes@feddit.uk
60 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TIEPilot@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Its a clean looking UI but how do they ban you for using it? Are they monitoring your comments?

For me I like the Lemmy old UI, simple and compact.

[–] dfyx@lemmy.helios42.de 32 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They don’t ban you. The UI automatically hides certain instances, communities, users and posts. This is not officially documented and can’t be configured or turned off.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 7 points 1 day ago (4 children)

You can turn ‘toxic mode’ on and enable all the hidden posts, comments and users.

[–] dfyx@lemmy.helios42.de 10 points 1 day ago

As far as I‘ve understood, „toxic mode“ only turns off some of the filters, not all.

Also:

  • The dev‘s definition of toxic is far from my own
  • Filtering belongs in the backend, not the fronted and should be configured by the instance admin and the individual user. We already have that in the form of moderation tools and blocks. If we wanted arbitrary third parties to dictate what we can see, we could have stayed on reddit.
[–] snooggums@piefed.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

What a shitty name for not blocking content.

It should also be the default.

[–] SGG@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

There are some legitimate blocks in there to my understanding, the problem is they were/are mixed in with all the random "this hurts my feelings" blocks so it taints the whole thing

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If there were opt in 'spammers' and 'trolls' lists it would be fine. The main problem is it being opt out and hidden, with it being a combination of those things plus 'people I don't like' being secondary.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 1 points 2 minutes ago

And they're still adding to it.

[–] Mika@piefed.ca 5 points 1 day ago

It has more than just list of users, it also has random regex for message contents.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Toxic as defined by one person

[–] Trail@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Brittney is the only one allowed to define it.

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just checked and you’re on the list via regx

[–] TIEPilot@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ah now I understand, its filtering. I bet it doesn't warn you about that when you install it... *sigh

One more UI to ignore, thank you for the clarification.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

One more UI to ignore

one MORE ui to ignore? what else happened?