this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2026
1045 points (99.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

11874 readers
814 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MorPolitics@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Honestly, white populations are being replaced through open-border policies. I'm not really a tribal person, so I don't particularly care about maintaining a population with any specific demographic makeup. I also wouldn't say that ideas about population replacement are necessarily fake or something like that. I do currently support controlled borders for a nation-state, but not because I want to control the ethnic composition of the population. In my opinion, that kind of thinking is strange and overly tribal.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Excuse me but could you explain what an "open border policy" even is? Are you talking about visas for skilled labor? Is this something to do with migrant seasonal labor? Refugee programs?

What the fuck are you even talking about? There's not a single goddamn country in the world that meets the criteria for some definitions of "open borders" and other defitions are met by every single country on earth.

Supporting or not supporting "open borders" is not a political stance because there's no meaning to the words, its nonsense.

[–] MorPolitics@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's one of those terms that means different things to different people, which can cause problems when discussing policy, similar to how people use the term "democratic socialism." The literal definition of "open borders" would be an anarchic policy. The context in which I used the term, which you probably didn't understand, perhaps due to a poor explanation on my part, was referring to open borders as a lack of adequate enforcement or supervision of the border (which, in effect, is an open border), with enough immigration to shift electoral outcomes or to supplant a native population's norms, culture, etc.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So what you're saying is "open borders" is used to describe a "feeling" you have about the border. Its not a factual description, its not an objective description, its an emotional invokation of a feeling you have regarding the border and like tourists from mexico or something.

[–] MorPolitics@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I don't understand. The idea that inadequate border control policies & immigration policies can lead to mass migration into a country seems quite objective to me. I'd say I'd be making an empirical claim thingo there, no? Did I mess up some phrasing or something earlier?

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

You understood "open borders" is subject to wildly different interpretations yet you still used it because it represents what you want to convey the best: Your personal feelings.

There's no way to measure the following as they are weasel words for people's feelings because they represent goals or thresholds nobody agrees on and people can always say they're upset about them regardless of measurable outcomes.

  • border patrol 'adequacy'
  • 'openness' of borders
  • 'mass migration'

There's way to measure:

  • legal immigration numbers
  • misdemeanor border crossings
  • costs and results of border enforcement
  • asylum seekers and rejection rates
  • tourist crossings
  • visa types and issues
  • immigration quotas
  • visa and tourist overstays
  • enforcement actions

Which measurable outcomes are you actually upset about?