this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2026
175 points (96.8% liked)
Privacy
4881 readers
452 users here now
Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
So, now we're measuring invasion of privacy based on "the health and safety and property of others"?
I strongly disagree with your assertion that "there isn't a big privacy issue" here. From the top of my head:
I know you jest, but I can't think of a single violation of privacy that hasn't been excused by using this metric! It's always about saving the children and preventing the crimes.
The article does not provide that data, as far as I could tell at a scroll. They really tried to get up there in the word count so who knows.
Archiving and saving that data seems like a nightmare with little gain. I am going to save my rage for when it is warranted.
In the EU sold cars must have parts of this feature in order to be sold legally. This feels like ragebait.