this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2026
405 points (96.8% liked)

PC Gaming

15128 readers
228 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] snooggums@piefed.world 46 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Seems like Microsoft is who should be supporting Windows. It isn't like Valve can fix Windows issues as Windows isn't open source.

Valve offering drivers and notes is what they are able to offer for someone else's proprietary product.

[–] DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Microsoft support one of their own products? Crazy talk.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 13 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The dumbest part of the article is that the author seems to be blaming Valve for games that chose a kernel level anticheat that only works with Windows and consoles.

But because many anti-cheat apps still aren’t compatible with Linux (hence, SteamOS), installing Windows on Steam hardware is currently the only way that gamers can enjoy titles that require them.

That isn't even a Windows issue. That is a publisher choosing an anticheat that has stupid limitations.