this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2026
377 points (99.7% liked)

PC Gaming

15591 readers
753 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 39 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Insane. Xbox' new leadership seems completely clueless when it comes to gaming. They're destroying their most valuable assets.

[–] Airfried@piefed.social 20 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

The new Xbox leadership seems competent. Which the Microsoft leadership quickly noticed and sabotaged. At least that's what I'm stitching together from the timeline of headlines in recent months.

Many aspects of Xbox seemed to improve until Microsoft announced a tighter grip around Xbox recently. Now everything is going downhill faster than ever. It's amazing how quickly Microsoft is demolishing their gaming branch.

[–] DarkMetatron@feddit.org 2 points 3 months ago

Well, the Xbox devision is highly cost inefficient, for every invested dollar they have a loss of 60cent and only a win margin of under 3%. They would make more money, and way safer, when they would close Xbox and all studios and put all the money on the bank.

Hard cuts and a strict reorganization is needed, and I know I will be downvoted into oblivion for this unwanted truth.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)