Starfield

3056 readers

2 users here now

Welcome to the Starfield community on Lemmy.zip!

Follow instance rules (no spam, keep it civil and respectful, be constructive, tag NSFW)

Helpful links:

Spoiler policy:

No spoilers in titles; if you want to share images with spoilers, preferably post the image in the body of the post. If you do make an image post, mark it NSFW.
Add [Spoilers] to your title if there will be untagged spoilers in the post.
Game mechanics and general discoveries (ship parts, weapons, etc) don't need a spoiler tag.
Details about questlines and other story related content are spoilers. Use your best judgement!

Post & comment spoiler syntax:

&lt;spoiler here>

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

Demigodrick@lemmy.zip

Starfield effectively dead, it seems. (lemmy.zip)

submitted 3 days ago by A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world to c/starfield@lemmy.zip

52 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Image says it all. Bethesda's being overhauled and Starfield is not on its list of focus/priority.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] tal@lemmy.today 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Quake got warped into the first arena battle franchise, completely losing sight of its origins.

Quake had both a single-player game and a multiplayer deathmatch. And it came out very early in the genre showing up and was very influential in the creation of multiplayer deathmatch games. I'm not sure that it's reasonable to say that it lost sight of its origins so much as that it focused on one part of those origins.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

In that sentence, I was referring to the franchise. There was no single-player component by the time Quake 3 came around.