News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
If I keep doing this I'm going to be known as "that district heating and cooling guy" but combined heat and power plants are the proven solution for this... Of course it wouldn't actually work in the US since you never nationalize natural monopolies like power or rail... Instead you have a patchwork network for operators that make the entire network as a whole drastically less efficient, less maintained, less standardized, and with constant rent seeking.
Anyways...
Absorber chillers are a proven solution for producing district cooling with CHP plants. Heat provides cooling in the summer, and heat provides warmth in the winter... CHP plants are 88-92% efficient since they make electricity with their heat first before using what's left over for heating or cooling.
If you had a district cooling system already like Dubai, this wouldn't be an issue...
I for one would subscribe to your district heating and cooling newsletter. I've long wondered about what it would look like to retrofit it into places in the US and how viable it would be.
I haven't done the math but my gut says it would probably cost less than replacing the natural gas network (long overdue in most of the US and Canada) plus reinforcing our aging grid to support massive demand for EVs and AC units.
The answer is probably small CHP plants and soapstone thermal batteries serving smaller areas. District heating/cooling also works best with density, so downtown cores are an easy win despite the cost of trenching in new lines.
Rural areas and suburbs are likely going to stay gas, and suburbs just aren't sustainable long term, so they'll die a slow death this century.
As an aside, suburbs have their utilities subsidized by most municipalities (chasing more property tax revenue) so maintenance is deferred onto new builds (also helps keep new builds pricy, raising property prices, raising taxes) and eventually that utility Ponzi scheme breaks. The amount of citizens served per meter of utility with suburbs is abysmal. The only thing worse is trying to develop shared utilities for acreages...
At some point in the next decade you'll hear of houses that are unlivable because the true utility cost will need to be paid by homeowners to overhaul their system (like a condo special assessment but you never signed up for it...) and utilities will cost more than the mortgage.
Sure, but we've never had a need for it before. And a lot of our stuff was built hundreds of years ago, and retrofitting is a lot harder than building an entirely new city in one go.
District heating is a lot more common and exists as a patchwork across the world in different places including the US I.e. New York has a steam district heating system (why the manholes there steam so strongly.) university campuses also commonly used it for centralized heating and cooling.
Cooling is less common but it does exist in a lot of places. Denmark has a decent amount of district chillers using heat from the city district heating system.
The big issue for north America is after WWI power stations were built at coal mines and power lines transported the power. As a result they were way too far away to act as CHP plants even if they wanted to. Europe retrofitted heat networks into it's existing cities since it had coal closer, or you were a port city where coal arrived by ship already.
The biggest reason it's less common is city gas (produced from coal) being used for lamp lights and then heating and cooking basically everywhere in the world at some point. We switched to natural gas in the 1970s to replace it but that same network is still doing the heating/cooking and prevented the need for a shared heat or cooling network.
With a push to renewables it's easiest to store excess solar or wind as heat in a soapstone battery. They're extremely cheap to make and store almost as much energy as lithium per ton, with the caveat that it can only store it as heat instead of electricity.
Having a guaranteed customer for over producing solar and wind during sunny/windy days makes renewables a lot cheaper to operate, and that heat gets to do something useful out the other end if you hooked it into a city heating/cooling system.