1023
Cleveland Voted to Kill Its Flock Camera Network. They Have REMAINED ON, With Police Still Using Them
(www.gadgetreview.com)
this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2026
1023 points (99.1% liked)
Technology
86131 readers
3656 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Who cares about democratic decisions or the law in the US, anyway?
I mean if we are being real they voted to not pay to renew the contract, and people checked to see if they were still there when the the contract ended.
No where was it mentioned the date the cameras were required to be removed by, nor what would happen with them.
A good comparative we have seen in the U.S. would be direct tv. If you cancel the service and the contract ended on June 29th, Direct Tv doesn't come out and remove the dish from your roof that day, they leave it there and it's your problem.
Cleveland likely needs to start a lawsuit against the company for leaving their products on their property and if they aren't removed by a set "reasonable" date schedule someone from the city to remove them.
Really I'm sure flock is just hoping to get them to pass a separate contract so they don't have to move them to another city