this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2026
1023 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

86131 readers
3656 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] farmgineer@nord.pub 12 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I started to write about covering, but I don't know the full sensor suite and I assume they can still collect a bunch of data. That sounds good as a first step, though.

Just breaking them off sounds cheaper, more comprehensive, and more in line with demands.

Trash bags feel too much like natural gas was for going green.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago

You know, you could fuck with those too. Those sensors are passive devices. They don’t directly engage with what they are observing. Which means they cannot authenticate anything. There’s no challenge-response.

So I wonder how hard it would be to flood the blinded cameras with gibberish data.