this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2026
23 points (62.4% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

9182 readers
240 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.


6. Defend your opinion


This is a bit of a mix of rules 4 and 5 to help foster higher quality posts. You are expected to defend your unpopular opinion in the post body. We don't expect a whole manifesto (please, no manifestos), but you should at least provide some details as to why you hold the position you do.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/uncommon/p/1236478/a-lot-of-anti-ai-people-seem-very-illogical-in-their-concerns-and-how-they-address-it-an

Before I lay my opinion here, let me say that I know that most closed-source AI companies have terrible business ethics and some of the AI companies seem to be corrupt. But that doesn't change my opinion about how people choose to deal with AI dangers that they have opinions about in illogical manner.

I understand that AI companies keep saying bullshit to bump their stocks price which feels dumb for the vast majority of tech power users.

I also understand that garbage journalism is increasingly trying to collect clicks from Anti-AI people even if they downright don't provide facts but rather keep pushing conspiracy theories and uniformed opinion pieces.

Yet, I find it weird how people deal with their perceived AI dangers and concerns.

IMO, AI is a technology and you can't ignore technologies like they were never invented. You deal with them and react to their developments accordingly.

You can basically just regulate it(by your country government) and adopt to it as a person.

For me a lot of Anti-AI people seem to act like conspiracy theorists in terms of how illogical they are.

I wish I could tell them that:

  • Protesting in front of for profit AI companies is useless, pushing your government to regulate them is more productive;
  • Not everything touched by AI is rotten and blessed by the devil. furthermore, not everyone should become Anti-AI as you are. If a open source project used AI it does not mean that it will collapse on itself and be full of bugs and security holes for example. Some open source projects use it and they seem to be doing great, other don't and it's ok. If a company decided that AI might fit a use case they need they won't necessarily go bankrupt and fail because of this;
  • Thinking about the creation process of any media piece rather than the quality of it seems also stupid. To give an example about how this harms the artists, take a look at David Revoy comics. He get accused of being AI artist Every time one of his comics get posted on social media(Reddit and other social websites) or chat spaces(despite being one of the rare artists who create open-source comics);
  • Creating AI free spaces without a need does not benefit anyone. A good example to show my point is the memes community on Lemmy. The community banning AI doesn't benefit anyone and doesn't really have any point than labelling it as "AI free" space without any need.

Overall, I think it would be more logical for Anti-AI people to be risk oriented rather than technology oriented in their concerns and to understand how to really address them strategically and practically rather than waste their time and energy in acting on a theatre for no one.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MutantTailThing@lemmy.world 45 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

This posts clanks.

In all seriousness, I wouldn’t hate AI as much if it wasn’t forced down my throat literally everywhere all the fucking time.

[–] DudeWhoYapsTooMuch@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

Right? If it was just used as a little tool like widgets or maybe similar to browsers like Google Chrome, I could get over it. But it wasn't like that.

[–] Airfried@piefed.social 20 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

I started to dismiss AI apologists that merely urge us to differentiate between ethical use and abuse. They give examples of how AI is used in medicine or for climate research and while I don't necessarily disagree the truth is that AI is a net negative for society by a long shot. About 99% of AI use is malicious at worst and wasteful at best.

The very few decent use cases of LLMs can be dismissed for the sake of simplicity for the argument that AI sucks and needs to be stopped.

At some point it's more practical to burn down an entire infested crop field rather than trying to salvage the remaining 1% that are still good and waste precious time and resources. If we're too gentle with regulations and bans we'll never get rid of the mold. Just burn it all down and start from scratch. You'll reach your goal of ethical AI use much sooner this way.

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 2 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

You seem to be using AI and LLMs interchangeably as if they were synonymous terms but they're not.

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

This right here is why I can't take people complaining about AI seriously. 99% of the time, what they are complaining about is LLMs; but they're too stupid to understand the difference, and too blinded by irrational hatred to learn.

[–] Airfried@piefed.social 0 points 4 hours ago

Okay but have you considered: Fuck AI?

[–] EpeeGnome@feddit.online 15 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Fun fact: the AI used for actual science like medicine or climate research is not the dumb obnoxious LLMs being shoved in our faces. They are purpose designed to operate on domain specific data types rather than on generic natural language. AI idiots love to point out the utility of these uses, but always fail to mention how they are a different sort of technology that's barely related to LLMs they seem to want everywhere.

[–] Alatarius@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 21 hours ago

I agree with this sentiment. But to be fair, I do use AI tools for writing analysis in my novels as a human editor is far beyond my budget. I just don't let it write for me.

[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world -4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

you don't know a damn thing about ai do you

lemmings have knee jerk idiotic takes about everything all the time - just look in the active posts

now you'll call me an ai apologist and genocide supporter because that's the other things lemmings do when you question their feelings

[–] MutantTailThing@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

Take it easy buddy.