this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2026
436 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

86131 readers
3365 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

That is not informing the potential buyer in a simple way, that's hiding the information in a different page, one which is a long text made up of legalese which one need Legal Training to fully understand.

You're just making my point.

You know what would be a simple, obvious, honest way of in that page of telling the purchaser that they're buying a license?

  • To the left of the discount and the price put the text "BUY A LICENSE FOR:"

"Strangely" Steam chooses not do any such thing or similar and instead chooses to "inform" buyers with a link to a different page which is a wall of legal text.

[โ€“] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You're just making my point.

I'm not really arguing against your point either though. I'm just saying it's there. But I agree it can and should be clearer. I'm agreeing with you. ๐Ÿ˜‰

[โ€“] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm just saying it's there.

nobody said otherwise. It's pointless to be arguing that point. It's like saying, google can monopolize the smartphone market because they have allowed that themselves in the terms of service, and people clearly agreed that and more

[โ€“] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ

Agree to disagree that it's pointless. You agree to the service or don't use the service. Nobody is forcing your hand at buying video games.

But it should be clearer for the dumb dumbs, definitely.

[โ€“] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

You agree to the service or don't use the service.

if it were so simple. it can be done with pure entertainment services, but nowhere else.

But it should be clearer for the dumb dumbs, definitely.

Congratulations, you just called everyone dumb dumb who simply just has so little time and energy after work that they literally can't read the terms and follow the updates to all the terms, or else they wouldn't get to use the services.

[โ€“] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I haven't even read it, but I still understand it because it says subscriber agreement.

๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ

[โ€“] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

"subscriber agreement" makes no sense when you press a "buy" button and you pay once, not continuously. going by that, it just makes sense that a subscriber agreement is not in effect, because there is no subscription, or you would be paying for a continued subscription at regular intervals

[โ€“] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

I understood it so it made "sense" to me.

It never says "buy" anywhere on any button.