this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2026
12 points (92.9% liked)
Selfhosted
60366 readers
768 users here now
A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.
Rules:
-
Be civil.
-
No spam.
-
Posts are to be related to self-hosting.
-
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.
-
Submission headline should match the article title.
-
No trolling.
-
Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details.
Resources:
- selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
- awesome-selfhosted software
- awesome-sysadmin resources
- Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting
Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.
Questions? DM the mods!
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Just to be clear, why wouldn't simply provisioning a certificate for each subdomain under the wildcard work?
Like, if you have a test site test.example.domain.com, you could have nginx (using acme) create a certificate for that. And then when you move to test.domain.com, nginx would do the same thing.
Now, technically letsencrypt does have a rate limit, but it's a fairly generous rate limit:
I would do my testing this way,, and I didn't hit any limits, although I was careful to keep certificates and reuse them, and to not spam.
If you need more domains with SSL than that rate limit would provide, then it would make sense to investigate Caddy with porkbun, since DNS-01 challenges are the only way to get wildcard certificates, which apply to a whole wildcard.
I wasn't aware of that they managed registered domains the way they do. I may need to reconcider my certificate setup currently, as I currently run a certificate per service because its more secure and looked cleaner, but if they count x.website.com certificates as website.com certificates, its entirely possible that when they switch to short lived certificate defaults I may come close to that rate limit.
If they cut the validity time for certificates, I'd expect them to also increase the rate limits by a corresponding amount. It's not like they have anything to gain by making it so regular users can't use the service anymore. They can't upsell you to Lets Encrypt Premium with a higher rate limit.
Yea hopefully. I know that short lived certs is currently an additional parameter when requesting, hopefully when the default changes they will have a higher rate limit. That won't be for quite some time though I expect.
Thanks for the thoughts. I'll reference this as I continue working on this.