this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2026
-3 points (40.0% liked)

Friendly Carnivore

101 readers
4 users here now

Carnivore

The ultimate, zero carb, elimination diet

Meat Heals.

We are focused on health and lifestyle while trying to eat zero carb bioavailable foods.

Keep being AWESOME

We welcome engaged, polite, and logical debates and questions of any type

Purpose

Rules

  1. Be nice
  2. Stay on topic
  3. Don't farm rage
  4. Be respectful of other diets, choices, lifestyles!!!!
  5. No Blanket down voting - If you only come to this community to downvote its the wrong community for you
  6. No LLM generated posts . Don't represent machine output as your own, and don't use machines to burn human response time.

Other terms: LCHF Carnivore, Keto Carnivore, Ketogenic Carnivore, Low Carb Carnivore, Zero Carb Carnivore, Animal Based Diet, Animal Sourced Foods

Meta

Carnivore Resource List

If you need to block this community and the UI won't let you, go to settings -> blocks you can add it.

[Meta] Moderation Policy for Niche Communities

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
pulsejet@discuss.online
jet@hackertalks.com
psud@aussie.zone
xep@fedia.io
remote_debugging@programming.dev
xep@discuss.online
xep@piefed.social
-3
Meat: The Original Superfood [Article] (www.diagnosisdiet.com)
submitted 1 week ago by jet@hackertalks.com to c/carnivore@discuss.online
90 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Meat has a bad reputation. Most people think of meat, especially red meat, as dangerously unhealthy. However, meat has unique properties that make it more nutritious, easier to digest, and less likely to irritate your body than vegetables. Does the science behind meat-phobia hold up under the microscope?

TLDR - Yes, meat is healthy - eat it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 2 points 1 week ago

You don’t have links?

Have you even read the article this post is about? I've given you links in other aspects of your comments, and you have ignored them. The difference between you and us is we have read what we cite.

I don’t agree with the methodology of these studies?

The reason this is a question is because you haven't read your own studies yet?

Can we cut to the chase here where you kick

Right there with you - you are not participating in good faith, you have not read your citations, you have used a LLM to generate points you ignore when addressed, you are in violation of rule 1, rule 2, and rule 3, and rule 4, and rule 6. Most importantly you don't keep the conversation interesting, you repeat the same points with ever increasing insults to others.

I think it's time you find a new community to participate in.