this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2026
-3 points (40.0% liked)

Friendly Carnivore

101 readers
4 users here now

Carnivore

The ultimate, zero carb, elimination diet

Meat Heals.

We are focused on health and lifestyle while trying to eat zero carb bioavailable foods.

Keep being AWESOME

We welcome engaged, polite, and logical debates and questions of any type

Purpose

Rules

  1. Be nice
  2. Stay on topic
  3. Don't farm rage
  4. Be respectful of other diets, choices, lifestyles!!!!
  5. No Blanket down voting - If you only come to this community to downvote its the wrong community for you
  6. No LLM generated posts . Don't represent machine output as your own, and don't use machines to burn human response time.

Other terms: LCHF Carnivore, Keto Carnivore, Ketogenic Carnivore, Low Carb Carnivore, Zero Carb Carnivore, Animal Based Diet, Animal Sourced Foods

Meta

Carnivore Resource List

If you need to block this community and the UI won't let you, go to settings -> blocks you can add it.

[Meta] Moderation Policy for Niche Communities

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
pulsejet@discuss.online
jet@hackertalks.com
psud@aussie.zone
xep@fedia.io
remote_debugging@programming.dev
xep@discuss.online
xep@piefed.social
-3
Meat: The Original Superfood [Article] (www.diagnosisdiet.com)
submitted 1 week ago by jet@hackertalks.com to c/carnivore@discuss.online
90 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Meat has a bad reputation. Most people think of meat, especially red meat, as dangerously unhealthy. However, meat has unique properties that make it more nutritious, easier to digest, and less likely to irritate your body than vegetables. Does the science behind meat-phobia hold up under the microscope?

TLDR - Yes, meat is healthy - eat it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tar@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

life cycle assessment. if you read the references in poore-nemecek 2018, you will find that they didn't even gather the studies themselves. they are doing a meta study of meta studies. when you read their sources, those papers talk explicitly about the problem of combining disparately methodized study data, but then go on to do so. poore-nemecek doesn't even acknowledge this faux pas.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ahh meta-meta-analysis! That makes sense - something we see used in nutrition too frequently

Unrelated, but since you appear to be well read - can you recommend papers on red meat ecology and sustainability? It's not a area i've read with any depth, but I am curious.

Another open vexation I have is what a sustainable plant based farm with no animal inputs or fertilizer inputs would look like, if it's even possible. From what I could gather it's not doable with no examples (they import fertilizer)

[–] tar@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

I really can't recommend any papers. I don't trust any of them that make strong claims one way or another.