this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2026
345 points (96.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

69600 readers
314 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

We heartily recommend visiting the free port of freemediaheckyeah (aka FMHY) while you sail the high seas, for all the freshest links the ocean has to offer.

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I bought Plex pass years ago for £79. The new price of $749.99 is INSANE.

No wonder all the cool people are using Jellyfin.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BorgDrone@feddit.nl 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Plex works just fine without a subscription. What is the subscription even for?

[–] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

If you host a server and have a lifetime pass, you'll be able to share your collection with anyone. It will allow hardware encoding so less lag on your users end. You can also locally download content on your devices to watch offline.

[–] BorgDrone@feddit.nl 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So no useful features for me.

I don’t want to share my media with anyone and see no reason to stream from outside my house, it’s not like I can take my home cinema with me. Also, why would you want to re-encode and lower the quality?

[–] remon@ani.social 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Well in your case you don't need the subscription at all, apart from some minor things the subscription won't do anything for you.

But I do all the things you're not doing. I share my server with dozens of friends/family so I need remote streaming. I can watch shows on my own server no matter where I am (at work or when visiting relatives, or even on the phone on the train). And if you streaming on the phone or with bad internet in general it might sometimes be a good idea to reduce quality to save bandwidth.

[–] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Just because the use case isn't useful for you doesn't mean it's useless for everyone. I have a family who enjoys media and I like sharing with those that I like. Encoding is necessary for people who are not physically in my house and who may be viewing on a mobile device.

You asked why anyone would want these features, I explained why I use them, and you've taken it as me trying to convince you that you needed it. Wild.

[–] lyralycan@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It has centralised features like proprietary user sharing (which is neat but still), arbitrary limits like device limits, the ability to transcode using your server's hardware, and other stuff that Emby/Jellyfin users have as standard. So we generally see the restrictions as taking power and ownership away from our own media/hardware.

And any cool premium Plex features like merging multiple servers into one UI get adopted and ported into Emby/Jellyfin pretty damn quickly