this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2026
171 points (99.4% liked)

News

38014 readers
1311 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SalmiakDragon@feddit.nu 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I read the article with Firefox Reader Mode. Here's how the cops describe the incident:

In a statement, the LAPD said its officers were directed to an apartment by a person who called them to report screaming, and when the woman opened the door they were confronted by a large, barking dog.

“The officers asked her to secure the dog, and the resident closed her door momentarily,” the statement said.

“She reopened the door, and the dog exited the apartment. Once outside of the apartment, the dog charged at one of the officers, resulting in an Officer-Involved Shooting (OIS).”

It might be bullshit ofc, but I think this qualifies as "being approached" by a dog. It's a dog owner's responsibility to secure their dog, especially after being asked to.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Shooting at dogs is incredibly stupid. I've seen video where cop shoots at a dog, the bullet hits concrete floor and pieces of concrete hits a child in the face. I've also seen a video where a cop shoots a child behind the dog. The dog will not kill the cop but he is creating life threatening situation to everyone around. Shooting at a dog is not an appropriate defense, It should be a fireable offense.

[–] GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Dogs very much can kill people. What are you talking about?

This dog couldn’t have though, and shooting it definitely seems cruel and excessive.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 1 points 1 hour ago

I'm talking about realistic situations. Yes, dogs kill people if they are attacked by a specific breeds or many dogs and there's no one to assist them. Can a dog realistically kill a cop who's surrounded by people, including other armed cops? No. Dog will not kill you with one, quick bite, no matter how big it is. You don't have to shoot it before it can bite you. Firing a gun to save you from a bite makes no sense.