this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2026
552 points (97.1% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

40371 readers
3493 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] halvar@lemy.lol 24 points 3 days ago (11 children)

I don't know... I've always found Kaczinsky an interesting guy, but now that I'm around halfway through his book, I find his arguements surprisingly weak as in he doesn't really put a lot of effort into justifying the basics. He just goes on to say "yeah obfuscating the process of survival is bad" and sure I can see how some people might find hunting rabbits with bows more fulfilling than looking at Excel all day but if you don't accept that immediately then his arguements become pretty weak.

[–] ZMoney@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I use Excel to calculate the ages of the oldest rocks in the Solar System. If I was using it to find accounting loopholes for a private equity firm, I'd probably kill myself.

Ted's problem is that he equates the tools and the processes of post-industrial society with its people. Just because the possibility exists for these surrogate activities to replace meaningful work doesn't mean we all succumb automatically.

[–] lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Ted's problem was that he murdered people.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Ted's problem was that he murdered the wrong people. Let's be completely honest if he was killing politicians and their corporate masters he would be a hell of a lot less controversial. So long as fascists, authoritarians, and their weak willed followers exist there is few excuses to kill the innocent, collateral not withstanding if someone took out a small town to kill Musk it'd be acceptable for example.

[–] lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm a Gandhi and King fan so I wholeheartedly disagree.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

As a John Brown fan and follower of the Allfather I wholeheartedly disagree with you. Sometimes the most just action one can take is the most brutal and destructive one, really it comes down to what one's own mental liberty allows them to do.

[–] lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

John Brown failed. He would have succeeded if he were Gandhi before Gandhi. Plus he would have prevented the bloody Civil War.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

John Brown failed in his original intentions of creating a new country in the Appalachians and triggering a slave revolt. He more than succeeded in becoming a martyr for the abolitionist cause and giving something to rally behind. Also the civil war was inevitable by the time John Brown did his raid on Harpers Ferry, he was simply the Prologue not the cause, even if Brown was a Ghandi like figure there would've still be a civil war since the South was not going to give up the institution of slavery without a fight.

[–] lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They told Gandhi the same thing, the British Empire would not give up India without a fight.

And y'know what they weren't wrong, right up until WW2 more or less shattered the empire by overstressing and over extending it. There was no such pressure on the South without men like John Brown, reminder he wasn't the only abolitionist raider just the one with the biggest militia and who earned the most glory.

But we can go round and round on this one indefinitely, I generally see pacifism unbacked by the threat of violence to be worthless and even with that backing I consider it contextual at best. The pacifism of King and Ghandi were nothing without the violence of Malcolm X and the Indian revolutionaries.

[–] halvar@lemy.lol 3 points 3 days ago

"Equating the tools and processes with the people" is such a good way of putting it that I gotta remember to remember it.

load more comments (8 replies)