this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2026
785 points (99.5% liked)

People Twitter

10067 readers
1004 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ech@lemmy.ca 22 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (3 children)

Llms can't even do math. And odds on them figuring that "highly complicated" technology out before the bubble bursts seems low.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 5 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

It's crazy that no one has integrated them with a graphing calculator, spreadsheets, symbolic logic software, etc., in order to increase their deterministic reasoning capacity.

Like, human brains aren't just the language centers, so I don't know why the people trying to build an analogue haven't done more than merely trying to make the linguistic capacity more complex...

[–] errer@lemmy.world 10 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

I mean the poster above you is wrong, they use math tools internally now when you ask math questions. Very obvious in Gemini. Yes the raw LLM trying to autocomplete the answer to a math problem is gonna be wrong but that’s not the way they are used to solve problems like that anymore.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 7 points 19 hours ago

The LLM has to choose to use the calculating tools. Gemini tried to do this one solo:

4 + 2 + 2 + 2 + 1+ 2 + 0 = 15

Tbf, it did four of these calculations, and 75% were correct.

[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 5 points 18 hours ago

no way i’d want to drive on a bridge built on their supposed math

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 19 hours ago

That makes sense. I clearly don't keep up on the frontier models...

[–] 0ops@piefed.zip 6 points 19 hours ago

Some of them write and execute Python internally for stuff like that

[–] backalleycoyote@lemmy.today 1 points 15 hours ago

Llms can't even do math.

Neither can a substantial amount of high school graduates in the US. Corporate is just hedging their bets that AI does slightly closer to accurate math and that meat machines are cheaper for physical labor than having to build robots. Besides, math is unimportant to capitalism. A company that loses billions a year is still worth investing trillions in.

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 4 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

It doesn't matter what LLMs can and can't do well: all they have to do is do stuff a person does well enough for the price of the tokens they consume to make that person's occupation vanish if it's cheaper - and it almost always is. The metric companies use is cost, not quality. Because that's how capitalism works.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 18 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

The bills are coming in now and much like all other cloud computing, it suddenly becomes much more expensive to do anything useful once you are dependent on it

It’s so easy to sucker capitalists with labor replacement schemes

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I would be ok with robots taking our jobs if you could trust governments to pay us the taxes they charge the robots.

[–] Meatwagon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 18 hours ago

According to Startrek you need a deadly riot first before that happens.

I also like folks mentality that "once they see the real price of AI everything will be back to normal". As if the very same companies didn't get baited into becoming dependent on American cloud service providers like AWS to find themselves later paying out the fucking ass for them once they are dependent on them. Guess what ? THEY ARE STILL PAYING FOR IT, after more than a decade of being swindled. They will do the same with AI.