Revenge

69 readers

73 users here now

Because karma need some push

founded 1 month ago

MODERATORS

ooli3@sopuli.xyz

153

shit abusive company psychological warfare 💀 (i.redd.it)

submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) by ooli3@sopuli.xyz to c/Revenge@sopuli.xyz

44 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Probably just a viral marketing, by a hated company that use not protected labor to get rich

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ok, but like was she using his account to pay for it or something? I'll take lemons for free anyday. Clearly the part that was terrifying must have been left out. Like she must have put instructions to ring the bell or hand them directly to them or something. Doordash will literally just put your stuff at any front door that has a few of the same numbers and take a picture otherwise.

[–] Apytele@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

well this or there was an existing no contact order and /or this was her way of constantly reminding him that she knows where he lives

edit: found it:

32 year old Toronto woman Chantal Tremblay has pleaded guilty in Canada’s first-ever “DoorDash psychological warfare” harassment case.

Chantal is charged with sending her ex-boyfriend 1,847 DoorDash orders over 8 months, each containing exactly one lemon.

Per the prosecution, the act itself wasn’t what made the case criminal, it was the pattern.

Among the court’s findings:

1,847 deliveries placed over 241 days. Each containing exactly one lemon. Lemons sourced from 247 different restaurants. She used 11 burner DoorDash accounts to continue.

Delivery instructions varied:

“Hand it to him directly” “He will know” “Tell him she remembers”

14 arrived at exactly 11:47 p.m. One arrived during his job interview. One arrived at a hospital while he was visiting his father.

The defense argued the deliveries were “fruit and therefore non-threatening.”

The judge did not agree.

so with them arriving during the job interview and at the hospital his dad was at it's not even "I know where you live" it's "I specifically know where you are at all times."

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 1 points 20 hours ago

FYI, this is a fake story.

[–] Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ok ya, the "he will know" and "tell him she remembers" is the real part that totally got glossed over in the image. That's definitely fucked.

[–] Apytele@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

yeah idk if it's just my background in this kind of thing but when I hear a woman actually got found guilty of DV we're either talking an extraordinarily skillfully antisocial man or absolutely egregious behavior on the part of the woman and the former is both somewhat rare and more importantly usually knows how to keep their business out of the headlines.