this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2026
410 points (99.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

31647 readers
710 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] uuj8za@piefed.social 110 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

I mean, there's a big ol' warning in the docs: https://docs.docker.com/engine/install/linux-postinstall/

The docker group grants root-level privileges to the user

But, I guess Docker doesn't really tell you not to do this... and I feel like a lot of mac users are not used to adding sudo at the front of docker commands so... idk.

[–] SirHaxalot@nord.pub 48 points 1 day ago (1 children)

… and the Nextcloud developers think it’s completely reasonable to build a plugin system where you give this access to a web facing PHP application.

[–] prettybunnys@piefed.social 9 points 1 day ago

What could possibly go wrong?

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 57 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sounds like Docker is just inherently unsecure.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In the same way that sudo is.

[–] cornshark@lemmy.world 55 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Sudo makes you enter your password and docker doesn't?

[–] locuester@lemmy.zip 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Docker does by default - it only works if you use sudo. But the docs tell you to add yourself to the docker group (which requires sudo to do). Then running docker doesn’t require sudo anymore.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 50 points 1 day ago

Yeah, that's a terrible decision in the docs. Don't ever add a path where anything on the shell can execute user-modifyable code as root.

As soon as you do that, you lose any protection that comes from separating root users and non-root users. Because now any malicious program can just use docker to elevate its code to root.

[–] Zikeji@programming.dev 25 points 1 day ago

Or don't give your user docker and use sudo to use the docker CLI to get the same effect. Hell, you could even alias docker as sudo docker to get the same feel.

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Sudo can/usually does ask for password - but if you're feeling lucky you can use sudo without a password.

(Currently doing that after repeatedly failing to install an OS and have not yet felt compelled to change it back).

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

Only if you tell it to.

[–] ChromaticMan@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Sadly, nobody reads docs anymore. Now that I’m thinking, people never read the docs.

[–] racemaniac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Suppose we all did read the docs. How possible is it with the complexity of a modern system to really take literally everything in account, and understand the implications oof everything to keep your system safe? It's great that it's documented, but if security isn't the default option, it will lead to issues, and everything has become so complex, that imo correctly managing everything is literally impossible... This is a systemic issue, not a user issue.

[–] Lemmert@reddthat.com 1 points 17 hours ago

I don't think it would've been an issue if they just put a warning in the getting started section in the docs (or if they just have secure defaults to begin with). But currently there's no mention of it. It took almost a year for me to realise that I was running "production ready code" in root

[–] glibg10b@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

I have never even looked at the Docker docs