this post was submitted on 24 May 2026
710 points (97.3% liked)

Technology

84940 readers
3687 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The reason the FCC is only allowing the sale of state approved routers in the US?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mattreb@feddit.it 17 points 1 day ago (4 children)

If you read the article ( https://dl.acm.org/doi/epdf/10.1145/3719027.3765062 ) they are testing this in an EXTREMELY controlled enviroment and directed subjects... I have my doubts that this could provide any insight on whether this is even feaseble for public surveillance, let alone effective...

[–] hovercat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I can tell you as someone who read the papers on very early deepfakes and AI video generation with amazement followed by dread, this is going to be feasible on a large scale in a short period of time. Researchers do stuff on an absolute shoestring budget usually, it's incomparable to what large companies and governments have at their disposal. There are already consumer products that were able to become fairly precise motion sensors with just a firmware update. Next gen devices will be built with motion fingerprinting in mind, I can almost guarantee it.

[–] Hazor@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Walk without rhythm and we won't attract the ~~worm~~ big brother.

I see you are also a member of the ministry. https://youtu.be/iV2ViNJFZC8

[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's also only possible because the information they used (BFI) is unencrypted.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I would expect them having access to that anyway when they control the device, or when they are the manufacturer

[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 1 points 13 hours ago

If that data were encrypted it would at least reduce the number of people that has access to it.

[–] Bluewing@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

It's a start. It may take time to make it work for "everyday" use, but if it's possible now, it can be done better in the future.

[–] brygphilomena@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It gets more accurate with more access points, too. So corporate and education settings will be the easy places for this to get implemented.

[–] hexagonwin@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

those places would just use surveillance cameras

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

the devices can still record more accurate motion information for sale

[–] Leg@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Right. Privacy isn't a concern in those spaces. Surveillance is typical.