this post was submitted on 24 May 2026
15 points (71.4% liked)
Programming
27029 readers
210 users here now
Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!
Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.
Hope you enjoy the instance!
Rules
Rules
- Follow the programming.dev instance rules
- Keep content related to programming in some way
- If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos
Wormhole
Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Is that meant to say reviewing? Either way, I can't see how this would lead to good results, even with a comprehensive test suite. Security? Scalability? Maintainability?
I use LLMs to automate boring tasks or generate starting points, but in my experience, i can't trust them to generate code that I'd be proud to share. If I use the code they spit out, I'm always adapting or rewriting it to meet my standards. I find they better at explaining code than generating it.. Anyway...
How will these students evaluate if the code they have generated is up to scratch?
You kind of have to have been a good coder to know what good code looks like.
I know, I know, another AI will be used to review the code...
Something feels a bit off here to me.
I'm sure I will be flamed.
Not even reading code? 🤣
A vibe coding class then?
There was a post on here awhile back about a Japanese kids program teaching CS principles without a computer, using real-world examples. Maybe its something like that?
So software development by magic - makes sense.