this post was submitted on 17 May 2026
859 points (93.8% liked)
Late Stage Capitalism
3283 readers
643 users here now
A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.
A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.
RULES:
1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.
2 No Trolling
3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.
4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.
5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.
6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc. This includes instance shaming.
Introduction to Socialism (external links)
Marxism-Leninism Study Guide: Advanced Course
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Which is why it's not an accomplishment for dems. Even with that brief super majority the best they could do is copy republicans plans. Which is also why the GOP can't make any legislation to replace it as it's already their plan.
Which then gets back to the point of the post
Edit, because people still don't understand they based it on Romneycare
https://www.cbsnews.com/boston/news/romneycare-vs-obamacare-key-similarities-differences/
https://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2015/10/23/451200436/mitt-romney-finally-takes-credit-for-obamacare
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2010/apr/01/barack-obama/obama-says-heritage-foundation-source-health-excha/
That is so wrong it is astounding. If the ACA is the GOP plan, why did they try and repeal it over 70 times?
The Republican plan is for the poor to die because they believe in social eugenics.
It's literally Romneycare with a few minor tweaks.
They keep trying because they want to break the government and kill people.
And Romneycare was basically put together by Massachusetts Democrats. Romney just signed it.
Romneycare was also based on the heritage foundation plan for insurance. So again it's still the dems only implementing a republican plan.
Also Romney didn't sign it which is one reason it's hilarious it got his name and he's proud of it.
That is a myth that originated from the Michael Moore movie Sicko. It's not actually true, but people keep repeating it like it is.
https://prospect.org/2014/01/03/no-obamacare-republican-proposal/
It's not a myth but sure keep saying it ignoring all the facts in front of you
You're proving my point. The idea of pooling the purchasing power of individuals is the only part that came from the Heritage Foundation and it's not like that is an original or new idea. That is what Social Security is based on. The rest is just Obama trying to give Republicans reasons not to hate the plan.
It's not at all comparable to Social Security. One is an actual social safety net designed to have the government provide at least a small amount of safety net.
The ACA, Romneycare and the heritage plan are all about not providing any safety for the citizens but ensuring the health insurance industry is taken care of at the expense of the citizens. This is simply because they can't handle the thought of actually supporting citizens with an actual Healthcare System people can afford.
Hell the Heritage Foundation was proud of Romneycare and only attacked the ACA as it was a win for dems as it was their plan and couldn't admit the dems did it because of how racist they are.
Except the ACA fails to accomplish anything close to that. It's not designed for it simply requiring minimum levels of coverage. It isn't even an option in most states. As others have stated it doesn't matter if a person is insured if getting treatment still bankrupts them.
You are entitled to this opinion but it doesn't make it fact.
If you have any facts to the contrary please provide them. It's well documented to be designed for insurance companies not the people, if it were we'd have universal health care like the rest of the civilized world instead of being beholden to for profit companies in order to get treatments
No, sorry, you don't get to say your claims are well documented without providing evidence and then demand I provide evidence in the same sentence.
Also, realize that universal health insurance doesn't equate to no private for-profit insurance companies or that there is a single-payer. For example Germany has a multi-payer model with both private nonprofit and public for-profit insurance options. IIRC Japan is privately owned nonprofit with single payer. And Italy is single payer with a sort of hybrid public/private delivery structure. Shit is complicated.
YeahI can when you've ignored everything people have presented you. Especially when you have done nothing to warrant any additional effort.
It's really not in other places as it's usually supplement insurance people can get not their only options. American only makes it hard because it's designed to milk citizens dry or allow them to die/suffer because they can't afford it after the insurance they pay for does nothing.
Btw saying it's complicated is just your opinion and needs citations.
https://www.cnn.com/2017/02/27/politics/trump-health-care-complicated
I'm impressed using trump to try and make dems look better for their failures 😂