Ask Lemmy

439 readers

4 users here now

Ask Lemmy community on sh.itjust.works. Ask us anything you feel like asking, just make sure it's respectful of others and follows the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

BomberMan9865@sh.itjust.works

csm10495@sh.itjust.works

Read literature in translation or simplified? (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 3 hours ago by schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works to c/asklemmy@sh.itjust.works

1 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm interested in reading Borges. My spanish is good enough for conversation & podcasts, but in my experience, literature often requires an additional vocabulary that I, as an only occasional reader, will gain at high cost but benefit from little.

So the question is: is it better to read a translation that maybe mimics the lexical richness of the original in a different language, or is it better to read a simplified version in the native language? I don't mind grammatical complexity--which can be applied in conversation--it's mostly the vocabulary that's the problem.

Assume an actually advanced book that can be simplified.

Edit: Or maybe an e-reader with the original text and a built-in dictionary would be best? I just jailbroke my kindle.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

For Borges specifically, I’ve only read it in translation (as someone who can only read English), but I feel like there’s enough nuance there that I’d prefer a translation. Maybe start by picking up a translation and a simplified version of a book in each language and see how it compares?