this post was submitted on 17 May 2026
794 points (99.3% liked)

Political Memes

11833 readers
1552 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 13 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Also note that those “charities” are just slush funds for their friends and is just a tool to reduce their tax liability. They need to remove remove the tax write off for charitable donations and just give more money to social programs.

[–] Abyssian@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

This post is about Mackenzie Scott. No, that's not at all what the charities she's donating to are.

[–] Hobo@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

How can you tell? Genuinely curious. Aren't those numbers fairly opaque? Or is there a way to tell what a specific person donated to?

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I think in general most people have a more favourable view of her giving because she's pledged to give away the bulk of her wealth during her lifetime and a lot of her pledges are unrestricted donations: https://yieldgiving.com/gifts?essay=20200728 ... I don't think she's one of those that's using her wealth to consolidate more wealth and make things worse for others.

Not to you, but I want to be clear about this before I get flamed. I'm not saying that is a replacement for a proper tax system or an equitable system in general. This should not exist at all. However, I do find that if you're rich that you should be doing philanthropy.

[–] TrippingBalls@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

Yes very unusual because normally they come with explicit instructions on how the money can be used

She has already donated more than Bezos has in his whole entire miserable scrooge life

[–] Abyssian@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Google her. She's awesome and worth reading about.

[–] 7101334@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

No billionaire is "awesome". Talk to me when she gives away at least another $41.5 billion.

[–] Abyssian@lemmy.world 0 points 53 minutes ago (1 children)

She's done more to help people in the world than you ever have.

[–] 7101334@lemmy.world 1 points 51 minutes ago* (last edited 51 minutes ago) (1 children)

Makes sense considering she has the capacity to do far more to help people than I ever will, on account of the disgusting amount of resources she's hoarding, sourced from the disgusting oligarch she chose to marry.

"More", in this case, is nowhere fucking close to "enough".

[–] Abyssian@lemmy.world 1 points 31 minutes ago* (last edited 2 minutes ago) (1 children)

I see. Instead of reasoning you rely on rabid hatred and mental retardation. It's absolutely insane to say someone constantly donating massive amounts of money trying to genuinely help the world is doing something wrong.

This isn't you having a reasonable argument she's anything but a good person, it's just you being hateful that someone else has more than you. That isn't fighting for a cause, it's just pathetic.

[–] 7101334@lemmy.world 1 points 30 minutes ago* (last edited 30 minutes ago)

Exactly the level of response I'd expect from someone allowing their cognition to be used as a billionaire's buttplug.

You're god damn right I rabidly hate every billionaire.