this post was submitted on 06 May 2026
11 points (100.0% liked)

/0

2176 readers
20 users here now

Meta community. Discuss about this lemmy instance or lemmy in general.

Service Uptime view

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It's no secret that the fediverse has trolls. Trolling is IMO antisocial and disruptive. We have a few on dbzer0, with one casually saying they have 100 alts. I have to say, I'm unsure how to deal with this. I'm unsure how to deal with someone this dead-set on bullying people, even wanting to recall admins. I have been told this troll probably has ASD (as offensive as that is to me) and that I can't impose my beliefs on others. But I have never banned people for disagreeing with me, my problem was that I and others were trolled and harassed. You could tell trolls things like "please leave me alone" or "stop replying to me multiple times" or even "stop following me" and that does not get actioned because it is not against the rules to harrass people this way. Look at the disengage rule, it doesn't apply to these situations. And try hitting the search button for "troll" on the rules.

I've been told yes these trolls are annoying and disliked by many (if not most) people and yes they drive away people like me from participating at all on lemmy or matrix, but that is not enough of a reason to ban. There are also trolls who report everyone they argue with and use their account solely to argue and troll. I don't want dbzer0 to be known as the place that houses trolls that get anyone who argues with said trolls banned. Report abuse was not ok in other forums, but it is rarely actioned here. The trolls I am talking about have their accounts housed on dbzer0 btw, a place that is not supposed to be freeze peach.

I know many of our users like to tell off right-wingers and libs. That can be fine if it doesn't get out of hand ("kys" is explicitly banned). I could say, let's not allow people to troll, but maybe some only want leftists to not to be trolled. For instance, one group of trolls we have is antivegan. Is that considered an example of leftists that shouldn't be trolled (and I do mean trolled, harassed - not just disagreeing)? Right now, there is a lot of room for trolling all sorts of people. One reason for our zionist rule is because we had zionist trolls that weren't breaking our other rules even though our code of conduct does not allow supporting genocide. Our anti-AI rule was because others were harassing some of our stable diffusion mods. People have been sent nasty PMs as well. You can troll on this instance and get away with it as long as it is not explicitly stated as not allowed in our rules. I have been told it has to be explicitly stated, one of our trolls is a rules lawyer who believes they were given permission to troll before their account was made.

So tell me about your experiences with trolls. How do we fight them? How can we change or add to our rules? Which trolls have been bothering you?

This meta post was finally posted in response to my comment here:

https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/25902072

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] YarrMatey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 days ago

Keep in mind my post is vague because I am searching for feedback.

I mean, no offense, but it sounds like you want the fediverse to be your way or the highway.

I have yet to find an instance without rules that does not ban people, I could be wrong since I am not all-knowing. If someone does not like how the instance is run, they can switch instances and their new identity will not be banned unless there is a pretty egregious breaking of our rules afterwards, this has been suggested before. I am quoting our CoC which prohibits what I am talking about, I was thinking of expanding on it on what is acceptable behavior (my thoughts in this post, trying to nail this down instead of vibes based) vs what is acceptable ideology (current approach). It's fine that you like to experience all that there is, but I think you have a misunderstanding here. We are not a free speech instance. If you disagree with me, you disagree with the CoC. And I don't mean this like this is my petty fiefdom I rule over, I mean that is what our CoC says about racism, sexism, -phobes, and fash. If you still disagree, just remember to follow it on your account.

The Anarchist Code of Conduct

What is Unacceptable Degrading, disrespecting, or insulting another person or group of people, because of their :

Gender or Gender Identity,
Ethnicity,
Immigrant status,
Religion,
Sexuality,
Language,
Physical appearance or body size,
Substance or medicinal use,
Disability,
Age,
Acceptance of any unfavorable or disfavorable group, whether this group is political, economic, social, or cultural.

Authoritarianism, or the spread of behavior that is designed to overturn the standards described so far, such as attempts to advance, support, or aid any of the following :

Sexism,
Racism,
White Supremacy (or any ethnic-supremacy),
Homophobia (or any sexuality-phobia),
Fascism,
Genocide,
Drug-phobia,
Ethnic-, gender-, sexuality-, ableist-, etc., based slurs,
Oath-taking or pledge-taking.

However someone having genuine beliefs which upset you is not a troll. Someone having 100 alts is not a troll. Someone refusing to back down until they’re disengaged from, is not a troll. Someone not being polite, is not a troll

I can unpack this. So, while I think there are some stances that is a troll and meant to incite negativity, I also think think the way a person defends these stances can be seen as troll behavior. Some users need to chill. Instead of troll, I should use different words to describe the problematic behavior, so I will work on this. After some discussions, I may search for a different approach while trying to balance the risk of overreach, but I will leave this post up. I want to keep using this meta community before making any governance posts.

There is some missing context here in that this post is talking about multiple users (who either individually and/or collectively):

  • that I find their behavior to not be genuine (I can't prove what is going on in someone else's head, but I think it is more than just a ND thing). I am not trying to mind-read, but I can sympathize with some of the reports we received.
  • I have suspected a few users had alts but since it was never admitted to, I was not supposed to alt-jacket people, which I have tried my best to refrain from.
  • many people are confused about the disengage rule which is something I wanted to be clarified and expanded upon because I am not satisfied with it. People disengage 'incorrectly' which leads to confusion.
  • I have never said not being polite is troll behavior 👍 in fact, I have seen someone that reports others for incivility which I found hypocritical among other things.