this post was submitted on 12 May 2026
458 points (99.4% liked)

196

6322 readers
878 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SparroHawc@piefed.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

And if the screenshot was taken just before the meeting?

[–] LurkingLuddite@piefed.social 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Then it's true that happens to also be unconfirmed knowledge. Until it is confirmed, it is never actually knowledge, which makes the whole premise stupid.

It is absolutely in no way what so ever unique to have something that is presented as knowledge that happens to be false in reality.

Otherwise EVERY food advertisement would count in the same boat: "true", but not accurately true.

and we all know that shit is false as fuck.

[–] SparroHawc@piefed.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Of course it's not unusual to have something presented as knowledge that is false. That's just lying.

The distinction here is that the conclusion is true, but it is based off of inaccurate information. The conclusion that advertisements are trying to steer you towards is false.

[–] LurkingLuddite@piefed.social 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

But the cited example is not the same as advertisement. At all. Period. What so ever.

Advertisement is based on false presentation in addition to an outright lie in the reality of the situation at hand.

What is literally pictured in modern advertisement is often not even edible product. It's literally, within the picture, glue or other non-edible lies.

So by bringing advertisement into this, you're actually bringing in something even less honest than what I'm talking about...

[–] SparroHawc@piefed.world -1 points 2 weeks ago

My dude, I am not the one who brought advertisement into it.

[–] groet@feddit.org 0 points 3 weeks ago

No because in the case of the advert, you would not be justified in believing it is true.

The whole meme is about a very specific question in epistemology. If I flip a coin and ask you "heads or tails?", if you guess correctly, you still have no knowledge of the true side of the coin. You guess heads, and it is actually heads but you do not " know" it is heads.

However if I showed you the coin is weighted and after a million throws it only ever came up heads, you would be justified in your belief and would "know" it came up heads.

The meme is a subversion, because the philosophers have every reason to believe the background is real, every statement them make about the room OP is in based on the background they see will be true. If they see a book in a shelf in the background, it will also be in the exact same position in the real room. They will "know" the book is there, but that knowledge is based on a deception.

It is an actively debated topic in philosophy called the Gettier Problem